The culture of death convention might seem to be a harsh attribute to attach to the Democrat’s convention but unfortunately it is all too accurate. The very platform that the delegates will sign today is the most ferocious attack against life and family yet. They have become the party of junk science and family experimentation. Al Gore was well known for his advocacy of junk science such as global warming and now they are also firmly embracing the junk science of embryonic stem-cell research. They frame the debate by saying they believe in science, in fact John Kerry said yesterday at Cape Canaveral that America needs a leader who "believes in science." Now I am not aware of any Amish like contingent of our politicians who do not believe in science. Who do not believe that the world is understandable and that we can come to a better understanding of underlying principles. But the debate is framed this way so that anyone who disagrees with embryonic stem-cell research can be cast as being old-fashioned and living in the dark ages. If you don’t be agree with global warming then you are out to destroy the environment. If you are not in favor of embryonic stem-cell research then you want people to suffer and die. The emotional and not scientific argument is used to advance the cause.
The favorite slander of revisionist historians used to attack the Church about science is the Galileo controversy. Never mind that this old chestnut is an inaccurate portrayal of events. The point is that the Democratic party has defined dogmas that no science is allowed to contradict. Instead the debate becomes highly dishonest where the truth of something is obscured. The debate on abortion is contra-science in that they would deny the humanity of the embryo/fetus. They would obscure this by admitting one fact and then hiding under the personhood scam, as if people grow into their personhood or that at the exact point of consciousness or activity the attribute of personhood is magically applied. 4-D ultrasound equipment was not greeted by a praise for new science in the Democrat community. Instead groups like Planned Parenthood and NARAL called this machine a "weapon." Laws that would let women know the scientific facts of the risks of abortion in right-to-know laws are not endorsed by the party of "women’s rights" but are vigorously attacked and everything is done to prevent those laws from passing. So passing of scientific information to women is prevented. Increased risk of breast cancer and infertility, big deal – we want to keep abortion at all costs. The debate in the Supreme Court in Roe v. Wade did not center around science but around privacy. Yet we heard no calls from the Democratic community decrying this most un-scientific decision. They keep talking about choice yet Democratic state attorney-generals have tried to close down clinics catering to women who want to keep their child. Kerry recently said "Let me tell you very clearly that being pro-choice is not pro-abortion." If you can buy a line form this by a person with a 100 percent voting record in accordance with NARAL and PP who make their money on abortions and not pregnancy centers, I have just the bridge in Brooklyn for you.
Now the Democratic Party is also turning away from democracy since none shall dissent from the abortion dogma. Their 2000 platform stated "The Democratic Party is a party of inclusion. We respect the individual conscience of each American on this difficult issue, and we welcome all our members to participate at every level of our party." This statement is now gone in 2004. Instead the proposed platform now says in part :
We will defend the dignity of all Americans against those who would undermine it. Because we believe in the privacy and equality of women, we stand proudly for a woman’s right to choose, consistent with Roe v. Wade, and regardless of her ability to pay. We stand firmly against Republican efforts to undermine that right. At the same time, we strongly support family planning and adoption incentives. Abortion should be safe, legal, and rare.
"defend the dignity of all Americans" except the pre-born. The make it seem like this is just a Republican issue when in fact they are disenfranchising a large chunk of their own party. I am not sure how they write with a strait face: " Abortion should be safe, legal, and rare." This is the same party that fights against allowing the same heath standards in abortion clinics as for other clinics that perform surgery. They mention the ability to pay which means federal money to pay for abortions. In Russian where abortions are funded by the government the abortion rate climbed to 89%. Whatever is federally funded you will have more of. This idea of rare is a sophist’s argument and means absolutely nothing in reality. The only part of the phrase that is accurate is "legal"
Adding insult to injury embryonic stem-cell researched shall now be enshrined in the platform.
"President Bush has rejected the calls from Nancy Reagan, Christopher Reeve and Americans across the land for assistance with embryonic stem cell research. We will reverse his wrongheaded policy. Stem cell therapy offers hope to more than 100 million Americans who have serious illnesses – from Alzheimer’s to heart disease to juvenile diabetes to Parkinson’s. We will pursue this research under the strictest ethical guidelines, but we will not walk away from the chance to save lives and reduce human suffering"
Now the latest alchemist trick is to turn embryonic stem-cells into golden cures for whatever disease you want to assign them to. The debate again is deeply dishonest. Pursuing stem-cell research under the strictest ethical guidelines? That is utter nonsense. This is like saying we will conduct transplants of hearts from a healthy living person to another ailing person under the strictest ethical guidelines. You can not ethically murder an innocent person to help another. No mention is ever made by them of the true promise of adult stem-cell research. The ability of embryonic stem-cell research to perform these miraculous cure has not been backed up by data. Yet even if the promise was true then ethical methods such as using umbilical cord blood could be used instead. Again scientific facts are not mentioned in this debate, instead they attack Pres. Bush for not allowing Federal money be used to slaughter the innocent in the name of research. Embryos don’t look like us, let’s kill them. Since they don’t look like us they are not human. Sound familiar? Meet the new boss,
Same as the old boss. Ah but in this case we are fooled again and another group of people are dehumanized so that another group may benefit.
So in the abortion debate children are allowed to be murdered to supposedly make the life of the mother easier. That a difficult situation justifies a difficult solution. We can experiment on embryos and murder them at will to ease the life of someone suffering from disease. These arguments are framed as the compassionate choice. We can and should feel sorrow at the plight of Christopher Reeves and others, but the answer is prayer and truly ethical medical research. John Kerry has been quoting the Bible lately and I wish he would get to the "never tire of doing good" part. Right now the end justifies the means if it is politically expedient according to focus groups.
Then we come to the attack on the family under the veil of states rights.
We support full inclusion of gay and lesbian families in the life of our nation and seek equal responsibilities, benefits, and protections for these families. In our country, marriage has been defined at the state level for 200 years, and we believe it should continue to be defined there. We repudiate President Bush’s divisive effort to politicize the Constitution by pursuing a "Federal Marriage Amendment." Our goal is to bring Americans together, not drive them apart.
I have a hard time believing a party that rejoices when the Supreme Court advances their agenda is pro-state rights. Where is their outcry that states were not allowed to accept/reject abortion? States accept/reject sodomy? I am curious to see how much same-sex marriage will be talked about at the convention. Especially it being in Boston where the the state court imposed same-sex marriage by fiat. But I guess this is still a hot-button issue even in Democratic flanks and so they are hiding under state-rights instead of outright endorsement. You would think that gay advocacy groups would be outraged at the relatively mild support of same-sex marriage in the platform. But they know, wink-wink, that this was done for political reasons and the the Democratic Party fully supports same-sex marriage especially if it came about by Supreme Court edict. "Our goal is to bring Americans together, not drive them apart." Oh and then why are you on the wrong side of the divisive abortion issue?
Being an ex-Democrat I would like nothing better then to see the Democrat Party regain it moral vision. As a Catholic I vote to advance the Culture of Life and to promote the dignity of all human beings. It would be nice to be able to choose between candidates on more mundane issues. The GOP is flawed in it’s execution of it’s pro-life platform, but Democrats who follow some parts of their platform are cooperating with evil. Jesus told us to pray for our enemies and I strive never to dehumanize those who advance policies which I greatly disagree with. So if you have managed to get to the end of this bloated post please pray for those who, as of yet ,do not see the dignity of all human life. And pray for those with who do that they shall persevere with charity in the fight for the unborn whether in the womb or petri dish.