Punditry Three branches of government by Jeffrey Miller November 3, 2008 written by Jeffrey Miller November 3, 2008 5 comments 0 FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest Jeffrey Miller previous post Voticons next post Here and There You may also like e Weekly Francis – Volume 314 – 30... April 30, 2020 A Tale of Two Bishops January 26, 2005 Another priest defies bishops on same-sex marriage initiative October 13, 2008 Meet the Jesuits October 12, 2005 Total Gift September 3, 2005 Misadventures in Catholic Media January 8, 2013 Warning Christian Allegory: Restriced Audiences Only December 5, 2005 The Weekly Francis – Volume 350 – 24... February 24, 2021 So I guess Judas was unavailable May 5, 2012 Wanting Catholics at a Catholic school? August 7, 2007 5 comments Guillermo Bustamante November 3, 2008 - 7:37 pm Mr. Miller: Today that you focus the non-elected Legislative-formerly Judicial, I congratulate you for moving people to ask the intercession of St. Martin of Porres (today’s feast), most fittingly, because he represents the two ethnic bloods mix (Hispanic + Black), who are TARGETED by the racist PP ads + abortion chambers-mills locations for the current genocide in USA. The point currently is: we must enlist the help of our angels & saints, to counter the arguing that the USCCB has to walk a “fine line, not to tell (sic) voters”, to avoid voting for the Infanticide Candidate. Wrong. Here, precisely, is proper to tell not to vote for whom blatantly are crushing the Constitutional rights of defenseless human beings (FOCA), as the U.S. Supreme Court. And compare indeed! The greater with the lesser evils: 1) The Infanticide Candidate’s abortion VOTING RECORD and commitment to FOCA. 2) The McCain pro-life VOTING RECORD and public platform. This election brings us to base: How Will History Judge Catholics? Will start with the USCCB history, and will follow distinguishing responsibilities. This means the angelic sword of flames, dismissing the lay lukewarm. The magnitude of the genocide is so flabbergasting that there is no way to disguise or down play this historic responsibility. Regards Reply Joe of St. Therese November 4, 2008 - 3:20 am LOL!, too true. Reply keith November 4, 2008 - 6:23 am The only exception I take is that your diagram seems to imply that the Supreme Court is equal to the other two branches. I would say it is the super legislature, with no need to submit it’s legislation for signature. It’s an Executive Legislature… With all the power of both and without all those annoying checks and balances. Reply Dave Pawlak November 4, 2008 - 9:57 pm Keith: Under a Republican administration, that might be true. But under Obama, it will be: “So Justice Roberts has ruled; so let Justice Roberts enforce it!” Reply Matthew Warner November 5, 2008 - 10:42 am I love it! Well I hate that it’s becoming true. But it’s a funny depiction. Well done, Jester. Reply Leave a Comment Cancel Reply Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.