Yes it is time for another VOTF survey that as Seekeroftheway says we can skew.
And when it comes to VOTF I say skew you.
There are only a couple of questions (around five) and they are as biased as the questions in any survey from the Main Stream Media.
They start off
With regards to Fr. Thomas Reese’s resignation from America, do you feel
Cue Peter Frampton and Do you Feel like we do. Not think or believe, but the oh so typical feel
It was appropriate – as a Jesuit priest, he should only reinforce Vatican teaching.
Get it – yep "Vatican teaching" as if this is somehow different and separate from Catholic teaching. Is it that I converted to the Vatican faith and would that make me a convert to Vatholicism?
It was the right action on his part to maintain the magazine’s autonomy.
No right answer for that one. Maintain the magazine’s autonomy? This is like a planet leaving its orbit and wanting to still be considered part of the solar system. Autonomy from truth is slavery.
It was punishment because Fr. Reese challenged institutional Church’s authority.
For VOTF the word institutional is bandied about as a swear word – except of course when it comes to the institutional leadership of VOTF. Remember when you say institutional to grit your teeth a bit and get that certain look in your eyes and you too can be a leader in VOTF. This simplistic and silly view is that this is all just about a challenge to institutional Church’s authority. Like a father-son disagreement. Where the father must put the son in his place because he challenged his authority.
The following was my favorite question.
Is VOTF mainly made up of gray-haired heretics who are taking advantage of the priestly sex scandal to promote heterodox practices to try to Protestantize the Church?
Well maybe I only imagined the last question.