As a pundit it is required by contract to put in my two cents on Hillary’s auto-by-proxy biography “Living History.” I am surprised that an avowed feminist she did not do the silly substitution and name it “Living Herstory.” Of course from what has been released so for it would be most aptly called “Revising History.” It is rumored that making of Ghostbuster 3 was put off because of the large number of ghosts employed as writers by Hillary.
If the New York Times wants to do damage control on their reputation by accurately portraying the news, they would put her book on the New York Times best sellers list under fiction. It makes you wonder if Jayson Blair was not one of her ghostwriters. He could have fit right into myth making based on historical events.
Now obviously I have no intention to read her book and find out how she reacted to her husband’s infidelity and how the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy (now changed to network) perverted the constitution and unfairly dogged them. Or how she couldn’t get health care reform through a Democratic Congress and Senate with her husband as President. For a feminist role model to portrays herself as hopelessly naive when it came to Monica and also as a victim of political action just doesn’t ring true.
It is said that Hillary has a polarizing effect. I can agree with that since I feel like a political electron flying through the circuity of the government towards negative pole. Her political views are much the same as other liberals in her party so I shouldn’t be more upset at her than to any other Democrat. But she greatly annoys me from what I perceive as elitism and willing to do anything to achieve an end to help out is ignorant little people. So while I greatly disagree with her views I try not to resort to name calling, though it has taken much self-control.