Uncategorized The court ruled by Jeffrey Miller January 20, 2006 written by Jeffrey Miller January 20, 2006 I wonder if Haleigh Poutre could be held for comtempt of court for refusing to die? [Via Southern Appeal] 2 comments 0 FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest Jeffrey Miller previous post Heaven and Cell next post An anniversary that can't be celebrated You may also like Harry Reid and Justice Clarence Thomas December 12, 2004 Just wondering September 18, 2002 Confessional windows August 13, 2002 Mel Gibson an ultra-traditionalist? September 13, 2002 Castro Weaponizes West Nile Virus September 16, 2002 Caption Contest Part II July 3, 2005 Tell it to the Church October 20, 2002 Another false dichotomy July 23, 2007 Women, Ordination, and Videotape July 9, 2008 All You Need Is Love April 8, 2003 2 comments Paul Hoffer January 21, 2006 - 7:59 pm When I see articles like this, the thought sometimes crosses my mind as to whether Martin Luther’s claim that mankind is totally depraved may have a kernal of truth. Ohio faced a similar issue involving an infant. The prosecutor’s office wanted to take the child off of life support and withhold sustenance to kill the baby so they could charge the father with murder. Apparently, to conclusively prove a diagnosis of “shaken baby syndrome” a forensic pathologist has to do an autopsy. Fortunately, the Ohio Supreme Court overruled the lower courts and refused to permit a guardian ad litem the right to “pull the plug.” For anyone interested, the case is: In re Guardianship of Stein, 105 Ohio St.3d 30, 2004-Ohio-7114. Reply Sonya Talton January 22, 2006 - 1:50 pm That is absolutely vile, Paul. Why did I not hear of this outrage? Something this abominable should have been reported everywhere. Thanks you for posting it. Reply Leave a Comment Cancel Reply Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.