I have been remiss in not promoting blog friend Thomas Peters of the American Papist blog of a chance for a scholarship. You can vote here once with no registration required.
I had read that The Diary of a Country Priest: A Novel by George Bernanos was a classic of Catholic literature and I just finished reading it. I had thought this would be a nice pious book of the life of a country priest ministering to the pious country folk around him. I could hardly have been more wrong. Instead it is the story of an idealistic young priest and his life ministering in post-enlightenment France with characters so real you can easily imagine the flesh and bones counterparts of them today. Wow, this is truly Catholic literature and the last sentence of the novel nearly knocked me over.
At most Catholic parishes throughout the world the Mass is divided into two sections. The Liturgy of the Word and the Liturgy of the Eucharist. I have come across a third section at some parishes. The Liturgy of the Bulletin. This is where the celebrant towards the end of the Mass reads the whole bulletin pretty much verbatim. This is almost always done in a monotone voice. Though I do wonder if a more traditional parish would chant the bulletin?
Now I could see the highlighting of one or two items from the bulletin but when it seems to be longer than the Easter sequence at it becomes rather silly.
I posted on this before and it looks like good news.
The Archdiocese of St. Paul/Minneapolis has banned an 82-year-old “cradle
Catholic” and his daughter from speaking at a Catholic parish.
Robert and Carol Curoe, co-authors of the recently released book Are There Closets
in Heaven? A Catholic Father and Lesbian Daughter Share Their Story, were to
speak Monday at St. Frances Cabrini Church in an event organized by the Catholic
Pastoral Committee on Sexual Minorities (CPCSM) and Catholic Rainbow Parents.
Yet according to Michael Bayly, executive coordinator of CPCSM, the church was
informed that due to “the number and intensity” of calls and e-mails
received by the Archdiocese opposing the event, it could not be held on church
property.
![]()
TEGUCIGALPA (Reuters) – The rapid spread in Latin America
of the virus that causes AIDS is made worse by the Roman Catholic Church’s
stand
against using condoms, a U.N. official said on Monday.
Some 1.7 million people
across Latin America are infected with the HIV virus or full-blown AIDS, and
the epidemic is spreading swiftly with up to 410,000
new cases in 2006, up from as many as 320,000 new cases in 2004, according
the UN AIDS program, UNAIDS.
"In Latin America the use of condoms has been demonized, but if they were
used in every relation I guarantee the epidemic would be resolved in the region," said
Alberto Stella, the UNAIDS Coordinator for Honduras, Nicaragua and Costa Rica.
The Catholic Church, which holds sway in Latin America despite the rise in evangelical
churches, opposes all forms of contraception and instead promotes abstinence
as a way to avoid spreading AIDS.
![]()
If only the Catholic Church was a powerful as they infer and that Catholics
are as obedient as they assume. Somehow we are suppose to believe that many
Catholics won’t use condoms, yet somehow they will commit fornication and adultery.
I am pretty sure the Church teaches that these are grave sins regardless of
whether you are using a condom or not. Final impenitence of these acts will
send you to hell regardless. Do they think that there is a deeper circle of
hell for those who use condoms in addition to these other acts?
Though this is the same logic they have used in Africa and the assertion that
the Pope is personally responsible for any Catholic who die of AIDS.
Here is an example of just how wrong the UN and its organ the World Health
Organization.
AIDS victims in 1987: Philippines 135 / Thailand 112
In 1991 the WHO predicted the Philippines would have 80,000 to 90,000 cases
and Thailand 60,000 to 80,000 AIDS victims.
Thailand promoted the use of condoms in massive campaigns where Catholic Philippines
promoted ‘Abstinence’ and ‘Be faithful’.
The prognosis of the WHO was wrong for both countries:
1999: Philippines 1,005 / Thailand 755,000 AIDS victims
Source: British Medical Journal, volume 328, April 10th 2004
Here is
another case:
Take for example a March 2004 article in the medical journal,
Studies in Family Planning (cited by the Zenit News Agency, June 26, 2004).
Titled "Condom
Promotion for AIDS Prevention in the Developing World: Is It Working?," the
piece was a meta-review of the scientific literature on the question.
The results shocked condom advocates. In the article, researchers
Sanny Chen and Norman Hearst noted that, "In many sub-Saharan African countries,
high HIV transmission rates have continued despite high rates of condom use." In
fact, they continued, "No clear examples have emerged yet of a country
that has turned back a generalized epidemic primarily by means of condom distribution."
No surprise, then, that Botswana, Zimbabwe, Kenya, and South
Africa — the
nations with the highest levels of condom availability — continue to
have the highest rates of HIV prevalence ("The White House Initiative
to Combat AIDS: Learning from Uganda," Joseph Loconte, Executive Summary
Backgrounder).
And of course Uganda which once has the highest incidence of AIDS now has
the lowest after a campaign the promoted primarily faithfulness and abstinence.
This campaign resulted in the largest drop of any country in history.
The irony is is that it is the U.N., various government agencies, and other
advocacy groups who have some culpability if anybody does. First off it is
always the individual first that is culpability for the consequences of their
actions, but this is reduced when all-out false information becomes common
knowledge and is promoted far and wide.
I remember once being naive enough to believe that the AIDS epidemic would
make people rethink their attitudes towards sexual promiscuity. Like I said
it was naive and of course we soon had the false idea of safe-sex so that everyone
could pretend to go on as usual. When it comes to the free sex culture – facts
must never get in the way. Sex education and throwing condoms at the problems
has done nothing to reduce STDs and yet the answer is of course always more
sex ed and more condoms. Oh, but it is the Catholic Church that is out of touch.
Why could you imagine what would happen if people actual followed the teachings
of the Church on sexuality and marriage? Society would collapse as STDs and
the moral repercussions due to sexual promiscuity were greatly reduced. Marriages
would be stronger and kids would be safer – horrible to think about if society
followed Church teaching. Lets just go on as we are because that is working
so well for us.
Dawn Eden wrote on her blog.
Reading about Rudy Giuliani’s talk
to the Values Voters summit, I couldn’t help wishing the Curt Jester
would bring Moloch out of blogging retirement to comment.
Well Moloch has now shown his hideous head and posted here.
also upset by the new English translation for the liturgy.
Again we are too stupid to understand words like
consubstantial. The more complaints I hear from the usual
suspects the more I am pleased by the new translation. For me
they serve as an anti-Nihil Obstat.
… so many teachers must have taken a vow of celibacy.
