Uncategorized The court ruled by Jeffrey Miller January 20, 2006 written by Jeffrey Miller January 20, 2006 I wonder if Haleigh Poutre could be held for comtempt of court for refusing to die? [Via Southern Appeal] 2 comments 0 FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest Jeffrey Miller previous post Heaven and Cell next post An anniversary that can't be celebrated You may also like The Little Flower August 9, 2002 Religious web counters September 7, 2002 A pro-life Novena for the upcoming election (Day... October 30, 2002 Return to schism, address unknown September 24, 2002 The quick fix for the product of conception October 9, 2002 St Joseph the Patriach March 19, 2003 Youths Defect During Pope's Canada Visit July 30, 2002 New definition for Irony October 4, 2002 Beheading of St. John the Baptist, Memorial August 29, 2002 We're Number One! April 11, 2006 2 comments Paul Hoffer January 21, 2006 - 7:59 pm When I see articles like this, the thought sometimes crosses my mind as to whether Martin Luther’s claim that mankind is totally depraved may have a kernal of truth. Ohio faced a similar issue involving an infant. The prosecutor’s office wanted to take the child off of life support and withhold sustenance to kill the baby so they could charge the father with murder. Apparently, to conclusively prove a diagnosis of “shaken baby syndrome” a forensic pathologist has to do an autopsy. Fortunately, the Ohio Supreme Court overruled the lower courts and refused to permit a guardian ad litem the right to “pull the plug.” For anyone interested, the case is: In re Guardianship of Stein, 105 Ohio St.3d 30, 2004-Ohio-7114. Reply Sonya Talton January 22, 2006 - 1:50 pm That is absolutely vile, Paul. Why did I not hear of this outrage? Something this abominable should have been reported everywhere. Thanks you for posting it. Reply Leave a Comment Cancel Reply Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Δ This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.