The Curt Jester
  • Home
  • About
  • Rome Depot
  • WikiCatechism
  • Free Catholic eBooks
  • Home
  • About
  • Rome Depot
  • WikiCatechism
  • Free Catholic eBooks

The Curt Jester

"It is the test of a good religion whether you can joke about it." GKC

Other

From Carols to Christ

by Jeffrey Miller December 24, 2009
written by Jeffrey Miller

As a convert from atheism the lead up to Christmas always reminds me of my first Christmas with faith in Christ. It also reminds me of the odd path and what God used to get my attention in some ways.

Strangely God seems to have used a fouled up class assignment as part of this. As a Freshman in High School I went to the room number of the next class on my schedule only to find that it was the music room for Freshman choir – a class I had not signed up for at all. While I loved music and at the time was a Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young Fanatic along with of course The Beatles the idea of Freshman choir sounded quite boring to me and not the type of music I wanted to sing at all. I was much more comfortable singing CSN songs with my Father’s theatre friends. I informed Mr. Gissel the music teacher of this mistaken class assignment and how I needed to rectify it and he asked m “Why don’t I stay and see whether I liked the class or not.” Well for me this was pretty much like Andrew telling his brother Peter to “Come and see” in the influence it had on me. Mr. Gissel was an almost stereotypical teacher with a bow tie and who lived in “Boring, Oregon.” Almost a Don Knotts lookalike (though he was a childhood friend of Andy Griffith). He was also a very humble man with great gifts as a music teacher and I remained in the choir throughout High School.

While I ended up enjoying all that we sang from a wide variety of music it was the Christmas performance I looked forward to the most. The first year before my voice had changed I sang the solo tenor part in Good King Wenceslas. It was also the traditional Carols singing of Christ’s birth that I so loved even if I had zero idea of what the Incarnation is or even a very basic understanding of the Trinity. All that I knew was that there was a beauty in the music and the lyrics that captivated me. As a young atheist is was the materialistic part of Christmas that I looked forward to the most. The outer trappings of the Christmas season were appealing as participating in a tradition older than you that helped you to generate cozy feelings. Also as a young atheist liberal my deepest theology was “All you need is love” which of course had no definition of Love worth thinking greatly on. I just knew that I loved the old hymns and greatly enjoyed Caroling in the neighborhood.

Christmas for me was also a time for me to use my creativity. I enjoyed hand-crafting ornaments and creating my own bows made of multiple segments of ribbon and the use of a glue gun. In my own creativity I never reflected on my own creator. As a radical environmentalist creation for me was something that had to be saved from man – not something for man. It is no surprise that the emotions artificially generated from a materialistic Christmas never stateside me and as the last gift was opened there could be nothing more. So Christmas for me as always a thing of highs and lows. Anticipation and melancholy.

Christmas of course changed over the years as I got married and we had started a family. I slowly learned that it truly was more blessed to give than to receive – though I also had no idea where that quote came from. Christmas for me had reached the Hallmark Channel “It is all about family” to me. An understanding on which I thought sufficient. The music of Christmas was also always a constant companion to me. I still so loved hearing those hymns and singing along with them in the car. You could always rely on picking up some secular station that played Christmas music.

Though over the years less and less secular stations would play Christmas Carols or if they did it was for a limited time and mainly of the “Jingle Bells” variety. While I also like the secular hymns that speak of Winter and the atmosphere of Christmas they do not hold a candle to me compared to the beauty of the traditional Carols that sang of the birth of Jesus. Unfortunately it was becoming harder and harder to the music I so loved in the bands of the radio I went searching for it.

1996 was the year I left the behind the dregs of my directionless deism. The deism that I had floundered in when I lost my faith in atheism. Searching through the radio the only Christmas music I could find that I liked was on the dreaded Christian radio stations. While I had grown to more and more to admire committed Christians actually listening to what they had to say was another story. Deism is a sort of no-mans land, but not a no-Gods land. I didn’t want to be lead to Christianity because of a cultural preference for it. I wanted to know the truth, but did not know what tools I could use to determine the truth about God. At that point I saw philosophy only as a way to deny something you are plainly able to see. I was unaware that the philosophy I was aware of was of the sort infected by relativism and skepticism.

So I took the plunge and started to listen to Protestant Christian radio to be able to hear the music I so loved to hear and sing. I put up with the interruptions to the music about Christ when they actually talked about Christ and why he came into the world. These annoying interruptions of preaching and reading from Scripture soon came less and less annoying. I became eager to hear more and more about Christ and to really hear the scriptures for the first time. Sure I had my abortive attempt to read the Bible as a deist started from beginning to end without going much further than the Book of Numbers. Sola Scriptura from the perspective of an atheist turned deist just doesn’t work. I had no traditions, even Protestant, one from which to interpret scripture. Through Protestant Radio I first heard scripture via a tradition that interpreted it and presented it in a understandable way.

This was the very beginning of an actual faith in Christ though it would be over three years later until my journey ended (and started) in the Catholic Church. I still had some years to devour as much as I could get in the library from the Protestant and Catholic sources. I just now reflect on the providence of the mess-up school schedule that in some ways brought me to faith. My aesthetic love for the music finally lead me to an actual love of Christ. I have written about other aspects of my conversion story, but I really see this as one of the larger threads in it.

Plus as a Catholic I get the bonus of being able to listen to Christmas Music up to the Epiphany! I no longer have that after opening the gifts melancholy, because now I have a gift I can never exhaust – the gift of faith. Thank you Mr. Gissel for your version of “Come and see.”

So whether your are a fan of my blog, a casual reader, or one of my blessed trolls – I wish you all a blessed and Merry Christmas and that the joy of the Incarnation will fill your heart. A special shout out to my fellow bloggers, podcasters, and everyone writing about, defending, and preaching the Catholic faith for all they have taught me.

December 24, 2009 6 comments
0 FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
Humor

The Boar's Head Carol

by Jeffrey Miller December 23, 2009
written by Jeffrey Miller

One of my favorite Carols utterly destroyed. For those fasting from Christmas Carols until Christmas I am sure this does not count.

December 23, 2009 2 comments
0 FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
Pro-life

Man bites dog

by Jeffrey Miller December 22, 2009
written by Jeffrey Miller

After the deal became public Saturday, Nelson was slammed by former allies opposed to abortion. He tells people he feels like he’s been bitten by the family dog. [reference]

When you invite a dog into your home to be part of your family and you say and do things the dog likes and then give him a sudden kick you should not be surprised to hear a yelp. Sen. Nelson courted pro-lifers and certainly talked as if the pro-life cause was the fundamental issue on which could not be trumped. He talked the talk until he voted the vote or imbibed the bribe. I guess pro-lifers were a trophy dog to be used when they suited his purposes to get elected in a pro-ife state. Pro-lifers were a nice ornament to have around.

Contrary to Sen. Nelson this was not a dog bites man story, but a man bites dog story. Pro-lifers have complained about his abandonment of the unborn, it was he who slipped in the knife.

Using pro-lifers as ornaments is nothing new. Even though Republicans usually support the pro-life cause – you often get the feeling that it is more an issue of politics then one of conviction for many of them.

December 22, 2009 8 comments
0 FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
Pro-life

Ambiguous "unambiguously pro-life position"

by Jeffrey Miller December 21, 2009
written by Jeffrey Miller

Back in September John Allen Jr. and America Magazine took aim at comments by Jack Smith of the Catholic Key blog and his comments on Sr. Keehan and the Catholic Health Association. John Allen Jr. wrote:

“Over the years she’s emerged as an important spokesperson for Catholic health care, including the church’s unambiguously pro-life position

.”

There were also comments about Raymond Arroyo concerning Sr. Keehan on his show. A week later Sr. Keehan appeared on Raymond’s show and I can’t say I was impressed.

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) — The Catholic Health Association is backing the phony compromise on abortion funding in the Senate health care bill released by Sen. Bob Casey and rejected by Sen. Ben Nelson and pro-life groups. The group released a statement yesterday that is sure to raise the eyebrows of pro-life Catholics.

The compromise from Casey is an attempt to get Nelson on board with the pro-abortion health care bill that contains massive abortion funding.

Sr. Carol Keehan, the president of the CHA said that, although she hasn’t seen the text of the Casey proposal, “we are encouraged by recent deliberations and the outline Senator Casey is developing.”

Keehan claimed that “now that a public health insurance option is no longer on the table, we are increasingly confident that Senator Casey’s language can achieve the objective of no federal funding for abortion.”

“It is our understanding that the language now being written would prohibit federal funding of abortion,” Keehan said.

But that’s not at all the case, according to those who have seen the language and provided their analysis.

Nelson himself said yesterday that the language “isn’t sufficient” and “the basic question on funding for abortion hasn’t been answered yet.”

Also, National Right to Life legislative director Douglas Johnson said the language is “unacceptable” and called it a “far cry from the Stupak Amendment” because it “would break from the long-established principles of the Hyde Amendment by providing federal subsidies for health plans that cover abortion on demand.”

Other pro-life groups including the Family Research Council and Nebraska Right to Life confirmed the Casey language did not “prohibit federal funding of abortion,” as Keehan maintained.

Also, in an interview on Wednesday, Richard Doerflinger, a spokesman for the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, said that the bishops appreciated the goals of some of Casey’s proposal, but that they did not actually stop taxpayer funding of abortion. As a result, the USCCB could not sign off on it with their support.

Catholic writer Deal Hudon told LifeNews.com Friday afternoon that the Catholic Health Association is making a mistake.

“Although its endorsement has earned it the fawning praise of notorious critics of the Catholic Church such as Amy Sullivan of Time Magazine, the Catholic Health Association does not represent the teaching of the Catholic Church on the non- negotiable defense of innocent life,” he said.

“Moreover, it does not represent the position of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, which has clearly stated that the only acceptable language concerning abortion in the federal health care bill is the language of the Stupak-Pitts Amendment,” he added.

Hudonson continued: “It is utterly offensive to think that any Catholic organization would actively support the Casey Amendment – or any amendment – whose language makes abortion the default position of the federal government.”

Meanwhile, in her statement, Keehan says, “As we understand it, the Senate intends to keep the President’s commitment that no federal funds will pay for abortions and in addition, provide significant new support for pregnant women.”

The statement is curious because the Senate has actually rejected the Nelson amendment to ensure no federal funds pay for abortions.

And President Barack Obama has already repeatedly violated his supposed “commitment” to not fund abortions — by endorsing the bill with abortion funding and signing a bill yesterday that overturns the ban on federal funding of abortions in the District of Columbia.

Keehan said the group “urge[s] Congress to continue its work toward the goal of health reform that protects life at all stages,” but her endorsement of the Casey language would undermine that principle.

This isn’t the first time Keehan has raised eyebrows.

She caused controversy last December when she defended President Barack Obama against criticism from pro-lifers and praised his choices of pro-abortion Health and Human Services secretary Tom Daschle and deputy health care director Jeanne Lambrew.

Sr. Keehan seems to be extremely naive when it comes to the Democrats all pursuing goal of abortion, abortion, and abortion.

What changed in the bill to make it so that pro-lifers could support it? Well nothing. Sen. Nelson just got full federal funding of Medicare in his state. A sweetheart deal for Nebraska and his reported pro-life convictions can be bought.

I am not disappointed in Sen. Nelson. I figured he would cave from the start. He talked a good game, but when it came down to it power over protecting the unborn was more important. I had no hope for Sen. Casey another faux pro-lifers who has shown his stripes before. As for the 15 Catholic Senators who voted for this bill at one in the morning they are not exactly quacking in their boots worrying about what their bishops will do about their support of federal funding of abortion.

If Abraham had lived in Washington D.C. he would have despaired at finding just one righteous person.

American Papist has a good post on this and that the USCCB did not support this bill.

Fr. Mallow also thinks Jack Smith is owed an apology.

December 21, 2009 4 comments
0 FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
Punditry

Typical Amy Sullivan article

by Jeffrey Miller December 20, 2009
written by Jeffrey Miller

Amy Sullivan of Time Magazine in her typically ignorant religion reporting concentrates on American going to a Christmas service on the vigil vice Christmas Day. Though she didn’t even manage to use the world vigil.

When did Christmas Eve displace Christmas Day as the time for Christians to observe one of the two holiest days in the church year? Some traditions, including Catholics and Anglicans, hold midnight masses on the Saturday before Easter to usher in that holiday. But everyone still shows up the next morning for the traditional Easter celebration, just as Christmas Day remains a holy day of obligation for Roman Catholics, who are likely to be found in church the day after attending a Midnight Mass. By contrast, the Christmas service everyone thinks of as “traditional” is the Service of Lessons and Carols that many Protestant congregations use on Christmas Eve.

Midnight Mass on Holy Saturday for Catholics? What world is she living in. The Easter Vigil Mass is to be passed Sunset on Holy Saturday. It is never held at 12 A.M. on the start of Holy Saturday.

She describes people going to a vigil service as an example of the triumph of culture over religion. Within the Catholic Church the history of a Midnight celebration of the Christmas Mass goes back to at least the 4th century.

Within both the Catholic Church and Protestantism the Midnight Mass and Midnight Service are the most attended. I guess Amy Sullivan forgets that the Midnight Mass actually occurs on Chrismas and is not a vigil Besides even if you go to the Vigil Mass it fulfills the obligation to attend Mass on Holy Days of Obligation. Even stranger is her description of people not attending the next day after a Midnight Mass. Well the following day December 26 is not a Holy Day of Obligation unless it falls on Sunday. Plenty of confusion in what she says in regards to a true Vigil Mass and Midnight Mass.

She also seems to forget that the idea of the vigil goes back to the Jewish accounting of the day from sunset to sunset. So this tradition is quite and old one and not because of modern Culture. The modern allowance of the Vigil Mass came about to some degree as a reaction to culture to allow those having to work on Sunday to still get to Mass. But this is no triumph of modernism but a way to accommodate. The Sabbath was made for Man and not Man for the Sabbath as Jesus said. It seems to me that Amy Sullivan has a bit of the Pharisee in her as displayed by this article.

If she really wanted to look for a trend of accommodation it is of Protestantism following the Catholic Church. Christmas celebrations in many forms of Protestantism among the colonials and start of the United States did not celebrate this feast. It was all too Romish for them.

Now a valid question would be are people going to early Masses/Services as a way to get it over with and on to a day consisting only of a family celebration. No doubt some do this as a checkmark to be checked. I would tend to doubt this as the primary motive for most people. This is just not the mood of the Christmas Masses I have observed. If this motive was the correct one than the earlier Vigil Mass would be more attended than the Midnight Mass. There is a palpable anticipation and a joyfulness that does not fit in with this secular view of things. An anticipation that does not run into just a opening or presents, but the real present of the Holy Child in swaddling clothes – Our Savior Jesus Christ.

The idea that Christmas Eve is a prime marketing opportunity to attract new members is widespread among pastors. In online forums, they give each other advice on crafting services that are broken down into digestible segments that will “hold the attention” of infrequent church-goers. (They also devote considerable space to trading concerns about the fire hazards posed by those Christmas Eve candles their congregants love holding.) One pastor said he considered regular Sunday services at his church to be “seeker-friendly,” but holidays like Christmas and Easter were “seeker-focused.” The irony is that by holding Christmas Eve services that cater to first-time visitors and shuttering their doors on Christmas Day, churches often fail to meet the spiritual needs of their longtime members on one of the holiest days of the year.

Well the shuttering of churches on Christmas is a purely Protestant thing since of course there are two Masses held on Christmas Day other than Midnight Mass. Not sure how widespread the “shuttering” of Protestant churches is on Sunday. I know a couple of years ago some articles made a big deal about some Protestant church doing this. Since it was so “newsworthy” that would seem to me to me that it isn’t all that wide spread.

December 20, 2009 12 comments
0 FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
Punditry

Signs say

by Jeffrey Miller December 16, 2009
written by Jeffrey Miller

WELLINGTON – A church billboard showing an apparently naked Virgin Mary and Joseph in bed together has sparked the ire of conservative Christians in New Zealand.

On the poster, a sad-looking Joseph lies next to Mary, whose face was turned heavenwards under the words: “Poor Joseph. God was a hard act to follow.”

The display was erected outside the progressive St Matthew-in-the-City church in Auckland on Thursday.

St Matthews’s vicar, Archdeacon Glynn Cardy, said the billboard was meant to challenge stereotypes about the way Jesus was conceived.

In the bible, the Virgin Mary became pregnant after an angel appeared to her and told her she would give birth to the son of God.

Cardy said the billboard was meant to challenge literal interpretations of the bible.

“It is intended to challenge stereotypes about the way that Jesus was conceived and get people talking about the Christmas story,” he said. [reference]

You can see the ad here if you are so inclined. Bleh.

Yes live it to a progressive Christian church to turn the Annunciation and the power of the Most High that overshadowed Mary into a stereotype. Yes maybe mix up a little Arianism and Adoptionism or some other warmed-over heresies to break up the stereotype of the truth of a dogma.

“Progressive Christianity is distinctive in that not only does it articulate a clear view, it is also interested in engaging with those who differ. Its vision is one of robust engagement,” he said.

Yes clear as mud. This ad really give me a “clear” view on their Christology – or is that Joseph-son-ology to them? Robust engagement has not exactly been my experience with Progressive Christianity. Disagree with them about homosexual acts and you will have the anathema of homophobia pronounced on you. I prefer dogmas that are true compared to their “dogmas” that aren’t. Maybe it is just me, but I will stick with Jesus being the Son of God.

In another story the government used a poser of Joseph and Mary headed to Bethlehem with the words “This is how Jesus was born, Joseph and May Participated in the Census. Don’t be Afraid. Participate in the Census in 2010. [American Papist]

Funny, I bet we won’t hear cries of Theocracy from liberals with Obama administration use of this poster. The census is not how Jesus was born. Jesus would still have been born even if Caesar had not called for the census. God in his providence used the census to arrange the place of our Saviors birth.

Plus what is up with the “Don’t be afraid” part? Are people really afraid of census workers? Amazing they didn’t add a picture of Pope John Paul II saying his famous “Be not afraid.” I am not afraid of census workers other than that they hire ACORN and other such workers who have no problem filling out false documents to try to inflate congressional districts.

Is their a religious aspect to taking a census? Well King David did get into trouble for calling for a census being that his motives were how to increase power via taxation. The Roman census was much the same in regards to taxation. It is suppose to be that our census is Constitutionally just to determine the amount of representatives in the Congress. Of course more and more they have used the census to compile other information not required such as race. So the moral aspect is of course the abuse of power that surrounds the census. So maybe considering the information is used by politicians to increase/decrease representatives and for stats used by other agencies maybe I really need to be afraid of the census. Especially when the government tells me not to be afraid about something. Don’t worry, be happy, and pay your taxes!

December 16, 2009 18 comments
0 FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
Pro-life

Abortion is their Bedrock Belief

by Jeffrey Miller December 16, 2009
written by Jeffrey Miller

Matthew at Creative Minority Report with some fine analysis.

I’ve always wondered what was more important to secularist liberals, abortion or socialism. Sure, the two seem to be linked but when it comes down to it, which one, I wondered, was the principal which liberals would cling to no matter what.

And this week gave me my answer. The Senate Democrats needed 60 votes to pass healthcare but Senators Ben Nelson and Joe Lieberman stood in the way for different reasons, presenting the White House and Senate leadership with a choice. Lieberman swore he wouldn’t vote for a public option while Nelson said he couldn’t vote for public funding of abortion.

And this week, Harry Reid did what seemed unthinkable just a month ago. He told Lieberman that they would take out the public option out of the healthcare bill. It’s telling that the Democrats in the White House and the Senate surrendered the public option before they were willing to take abortion out.

Let’s remember, the whole point of this healthcare bill and the main focus of Barack Obama’s first year in the Presidency was the public option. And they just gave it away so that they wouldn’t have to take out federal funding of abortion.

So in short, while liberals say that they believe that everyone is entitled to healthcare even at taxpayer expense what they really mean is that everyone is entitled to an abortion at taxpayer expense. They have proven with their actions that abortion is the bedrock principal of the Democratic Party. [reference]

So true. Instead of leaving it out of the health care bill and then through the normal incrementalism to add it in later they decided to compromise on pretty much everything but abortion. The Senate bill even got worse over time. The Democratic Party being a wholly owned subsidiary of the abortion industry might be a polemic statement, but a rather true one. Before they could get Federal funding of abortion they went this route.

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) — The Senate approved an omnibus spending bill on Sunday that would lift the 13-year-long ban on directly paying for abortions in the nation’s capital. The legislation, which President Barack Obama is expected to sign, also contains funding for Planned Parenthood and the UNFPA.

The Senate passed the bill, which funds several federal government departments, by a 57-35 vote, with Democrats backing the measure and most Republicans opposing it.

Passage of the measure today was no surprise given that Democrats won a filibuster battle on a narrow 60-34 vote that saw Republican Sens. Susan Collins of Maine, Thad Cochran of Mississippi and Richard Shelby of Alabama side with Democrats to move ahead to a vote on the bill.

Those same three Republicans voted for the bill and three Democrats, pro-abortion Sens. Evan Bayh of Indiana, Claire McCaskill of Missouri and Russ Feingold of Wisconsin, all voted against it for other reasons.

Shelby voted for the bill even though he signed a letter along with 35 other Republicans saying they would filibuster it because of the abortion funding. Collins and Cochran did not sign the letter.

Democrats held open the vote to allow ailing pro-abortion Sen. Robert Byrd to come to the Senate to vote and for pro-abortion Jewish Sen. Joseph Lieberman to walk from synagogue to support it.

Several pro-life organizations called on members of the Senate to oppose the bill because it overturned the Dornan Amendment that has prohibited taxpayer funding of abortions in the District of Columbia.

Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council called the bill “a Christmas gift to Planned Parenthood” and “supporters of coercive abortion.”

“This appropriations bill guts a longstanding prohibition on using public funds to pay for abortions in the District of Columbia,” Charmaine Yoest of Americans United for Life complained in a statement to LifeNews.com.

“The bill also provides millions of dollars for international ‘family planning’ that could be directed to organizations that pay for and promote abortions. A majority of Americans do not support the use of their tax dollars to pay for abortions,” she said.

The bill also appropriates $648.5 million for international family planning funding, an increase of $103 million from Fiscal Year 2009, without the constraints of the Mexico City Policy to prevent these dollars from being provided to organizations that promote and perform abortions.

The bill also increases funding for the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), which has an admittedly pro-abortion agenda and has been criticized for working hand-in-hand with Chinese population control officials, to $55 million, a $5 million increase from FY09. [reference]

That subsidy of abortion in Washington D.C was likely to happen has been know for some months. While the Bishops have been generally quite excellent in opposing Federal funding of abortion, I haven’t heard any reference to funding of abortion in Washington D.C. by them. Bishop Wuerl has been outspoken on the D.C. Council’s attempt to not allow religious exemptions in regard to same-sex marriage. As the excellent catechist that he is I wish that he would speak up about this travesty. Unfortunately it will be our nations capitol which will be the first with taxpayer funding of abortion.

One thing we will not hear is the race card dropped on the fact that the populations of an area with a majority black population will also be the first area with federal funding of abortion.

December 16, 2009 7 comments
0 FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
Punditry

Professor Carter

by Jeffrey Miller December 13, 2009
written by Jeffrey Miller

Whenever you want to revise the historical events of early Church history you pretty much have to go with some theory of how in the third or forth century evil men supplanted the true Gospel and replaced it with something else. Mormons call it the great apostasy. Dan Brownians place it with the Emperor Constantine. Many groups do roughly the same thing.

Now we once again hear from “church historian” Jimmy Carter.

In opposition to the vast majority of authentic scholars and historians, Carter asserted: “It’s clear that during the early Christian era women served as deacons, priests, bishops, apostles, teachers and prophets.” He added: “It wasn’t until the 4th century or the 3rd at the earliest that dominant Christian leaders, all men, twisted and distorted Holy Scriptures to perpetuate their ascendant position within the religious hierarchy.” [reference]

Well if those “dominant Christian leaders” did such a good job – then how does Mr. Carter know there were women priests and bishops? These men must of done a pretty good job of erasing the record of all these women since historically there is no mention of them in any documents other than the women priests in some heretical sects such as Collyridianism where Mary was worshipped as God. Somehow I don’t think Jimmy Carter and other defenders of woman priests would endorse the beliefs of these heretical groups with women priests. What references to woman priests we actually have in the writings of the Early Church Fathers is a disavowal of them.

Now what Jimmy Carter means by “twisted and distorted Holy Scriptures” is hard to tell. Since the canon of scripture was defined during this time period I guess he says that the evil men who erase the record also managed to define the very books of the New Testament that he accepts. Does he refer to the fact that Jesus only picked men in the Gospels as being a distortion? Otherwise exactly what passages were twisted? No like all of this stripe general assertions is all that is made without a shred of evidence backing up what they say. No doubt President Carter heard someone else make these assertions and then just passes them on like so much of anti-Catholic bigotry.

My real question would be if Mr. Carter says that there were woman priests and bishops in the Early Church then why does he not belong to a church that has priests and bishops. If he accepts this as the structure of the Early Church than why is he a Southern Baptist? Really if you are going to go down the road as to accept the Early Church in the first two centuries than there is a lot of examples that Jimmy Carter is not following. Cardinal Newman said “To be deep in history is to cease to be Protestant”. There might be a lot of things Jimmy Carter is deep into, but one of them is not history.

December 13, 2009 23 comments
0 FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
Punditry

Not a way to celebrate a feast

by Jeffrey Miller December 9, 2009
written by Jeffrey Miller

So how does the National Catholic Reporter celebrate the feast of St. Juan Diego? Why of course by linking to articles denying that he ever existed.

Yes a nice way to start a day. Commit heresy. The First Vatican Council defined the limited circumstances when a Pope is exercises his charism of infallibility. Canonization of saints by the Pope uses the very language used to define something that all the faithful must believe. The pope states “we declare and define that Blessed N., is a saint” (example) which triggers the Church’s gift of infallibility. So to deny that Juan Diego is a saint is also to deny the First Vatican Council on papal infallibility. An ex cathedra statement requires an assent of faith. Anyone who denies thus teachings, or who obstinately doubts these teachings are in heresy and thereby automatically excommunicated as per Canon law.

Spirit of Vatican II types seem to forget Lumen Gentium discussion of the four levels of Church teaching. Yeah I know reading the actual documents is a bit much.

Up to the time that St. Juan Diego was canonized certainly there could be historical arguments about the actual existence of this man. So for the NCReporter’s to continue to imply that he did not exist is heresy – or at least one more added to the heap for them.

Anne Rice in her last book in the Vampire Chronicles involved St. Juan Diego in the plot. At one point the Vampire Lestat reads an article about him since he has a subscription to the National Catholic Reporter (figures). So questions of his existence are part of the novel and it is obvious that Anne Rice was swayed by this dissident rag. Lestat ponders the intersection of papal infallibility and a non-existent saint and imagines Juan Diego popping into Heaven upon the Pope’s proclamation. Well at least the Vampire Lestat seems to have a higher regard for papal infallibility than the National Catholic Reporter.

December 9, 2009 9 comments
0 FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
Pro-life

Apples and Oranges

by Jeffrey Miller December 9, 2009
written by Jeffrey Miller

With Senator Boxer and others once again bringing up the argument comparing Viagra to abortion and that if health care pays for one it must pay for the other for equality; you have to wonder when they will ever raise a serious argument.

This argument makes a fundamental error in it’s comparison. An error that is all to prevalent. True health care is aimed at health. Now that is a rather simple statement, but it seems to be forgotten. Medicines like Viagra are suppose to repair a problem. To restore the body to health. Direct abortion does not make a women healthier. It does nothing for the health of the child other than to eliminate it. So this is truly an apple and oranges comparison.

Unfortunately there is a lot of so called heath care that is nothing of the kind. Sterilization and contraception are obstructions and actually prevent the human body to work as intended. They do not make the reproductive system healthier since it causes it to not function correctly. Hormonal contraception has other effects that not only fool the body into to thinking it’s pregnant 24/7 but has other side effects that cause harm not health.

December 9, 2009 9 comments
0 FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
Newer Posts
Older Posts

About Me

Jeff Miller is a former atheist who after spending forty years in the wilderness finds himself with both astonishment and joy a member of the Catholic Church. This award-winning blog presents my hopefully humorous and sometimes serious take on things religious, political, and whatever else crosses my mind.

Conversion story

  • Catholic Answers Magazine
  • Coming Home Network

Appearances on:

  • The Journey Home
  • Hands On Apologetics (YouTube)
  • Catholic RE.CON.

Blogging since July 2002

Recent Posts

  • The Weekly Leo

  • A Litany of Gratitude

  • The Spiritual Life and Memes

  • What is your distance from Jesus on the Cross?

  • Feast of St. Thomas, Apostle

  • Gratitude and Generosity

  • “The Heart and Center of Catholicism”

  • Post-Lent Report

  • Stay in your lane

  • Echoing through creation

  • Another Heaven

  • My Year in Books – 2024 Edition

  • I Have a Confession to Make

  • A Mandatory Take

  • Everybody is ignorant

  • Sacramental Disposal, LLC

  • TL;DH (Too Long;Didn’t Hear)

  • A Shop Mark Would Like

  • The Narrow Way Through the Sacred Heart of Jesus

  • Time Travel and Fixing Up Our Past

  • The Weekly Leo

  • The Weekly Leo

  • The Weekly Leo

  • The Weekly Leo

Meta

I also blog at Happy Catholic Bookshelf Entries RSS
Entries ATOM
Comments RSS
Email: curtjester@gmail.com

What I'm currently reading

Subscribe to The Curt Jester by Email

Endorsements

  • The Curt Jester: Disturbingly Funny --Mark Shea
  • EX-cellent blog --Jimmy Akin
  • One wag has even posted a list of the Top Ten signs that someone is in the grip of "motu-mania," -- John Allen Jr.
  • Brilliance abounds --Victor Lams
  • The Curt Jester is a blog of wise-ass musings on the media, politics, and things "Papist." The Revealer

Archives

About Me

Jeff Miller is a former atheist who after spending forty years in the wilderness finds himself with both astonishment and joy a member of the Catholic Church. This award winning blog presents my hopefully humorous and sometimes serious take on things religious, political, and whatever else crosses my mind.
My conversion story
  • The Curt Jester: Disturbingly Funny --Mark Shea
  • EX-cellent blog --Jimmy Akin
  • One wag has even posted a list of the Top Ten signs that someone is in the grip of "motu-mania," -- John Allen Jr.
  • Brilliance abounds --Victor Lams
  • The Curt Jester is a blog of wise-ass musings on the media, politics, and things "Papist." The Revealer

Meta

I also blog at Happy Catholic Bookshelf Twitter
Facebook
Entries RSS
Entries ATOM
Comments RSS 2.0" >RSS
Email: curtjester@gmail.com

What I'm currently reading

Subscribe to The Curt Jester by Email

Commercial Interuption

Podcasts

•Catholic Answers Live Subscribe to Podcast RSS
•Catholic Underground Subscribe to Podcast RSS
•Catholic Vitamins Subscribe to Podcast RSS
•EWTN (Multiple Podcasts) Subscribe to Podcast RSS
•Forgotten Classics Subscribe to Podcast RSS
•Kresta in the Afternoon Subscribe to Podcast RSS
•SQPN - Tons of great Catholic podcasts Subscribe to Podcast RSS
•The Catholic Hack Subscribe to Podcast RSS
•The Catholic Laboratory Subscribe to Podcast RSS
•The Catholics Next Door Subscribe to Podcast RSS
•What does the prayer really say? Subscribe to Podcast RSS

Archives

Catholic Sites

  • Big Pulpit
  • Capuchin Friars
  • Catholic Answers
  • Catholic Lane
  • Crisis Magazine
  • New Evangelizers
  • Waking Up Catholic

Ministerial Bloghood

  • A Jesuit’s Journey
  • A Shepherd’s Voice
  • Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam
  • Adam’s Ale
  • Archbishop Dolan
  • Bonfire of the Vanities
  • Cardinal Sean’s Blog
  • Da Mihi Animas
  • Domine, da mihi hanc aquam!
  • Father Joe
  • Fr. Roderick
  • Godzdogz
  • Laus Crucis
  • Omne Quod Spirat, Laudet Dominum
  • Orthometer
  • Priests for Life
  • Servant and Steward
  • Standing on My Head
  • The hermeneutic of continuity
  • This Week at Vatican II
  • Waiting in Joyful Hope
  • What Does The Prayer Really Say?

Bloghood of the Faithful

  • A Catholic Mom Climbing the Pillars
  • A Catholic Mom in Hawaii
  • A Long Island Catholic
  • A Wing And A Prayer
  • Acts of the Apostasy
  • Ad Altare Dei
  • AdoroTeDevote
  • Against the Grain
  • Aggie Catholics
  • Aliens in this world
  • Always Catholic
  • American Chesterton Society
  • American Papist
  • Among Women
  • And Sometimes Tea
  • Ask Sister Mary Martha
  • auntie joanna writes
  • Bad Catholic
  • Bethune Catholic
  • Big C Catholics
  • Bl. Thaddeus McCarthy's Catholic Heritage Association
  • Catholic and Enjoying It!
  • Catholic Answers Blog
  • Catholic Fire
  • Catholic New Media Roundup
  • Charlotte was Both
  • Christus Vincit
  • Confessions of a Hot Carmel Sundae
  • Cor ad cor loquitur
  • Courageous Priest
  • Creative Minority Report
  • CVSTOS FIDEI
  • Dads Called to Holiness
  • Darwin Catholic
  • Defend us in Battle
  • Defenders of the Catholic Faith
  • Disputations
  • Divine Life
  • Domenico Bettinelli Jr.
  • Dominican Idaho
  • Dyspectic Mutterings
  • Ecce Homo
  • Ecclesia Militans
  • Eve Tushnet
  • Eye of the Tiber
  • feminine-genius
  • Five Feet of Fury
  • Flying Stars
  • For The Greater Glory
  • Get Religion
  • GKC’s Favourite
  • God’s Wonderful Love
  • Gray Matters
  • Happy Catholic
  • Ignatius Insight Scoop
  • In Dwelling
  • In the Light of the Law
  • InForum Blog
  • Jeff Cavins
  • Jimmy Akin
  • John C. Wright
  • La Salette Journey
  • Laudem Gloriae
  • Lex Communis
  • Life is a Prayer
  • Man with Black Hat
  • Maria Lectrix
  • Mary Meets Dolly
  • MONIALES OP
  • Mulier Fortis
  • Musings of a Pertinacious Papist
  • My Domestic Church
  • Nunblog
  • Oblique House
  • Open wide the doors to Christ!
  • Over the Rhine and Into the Tiber
  • Patrick Madrid
  • Pro Ecclesia * Pro Familia * Pro Civitate
  • Recta Ratio
  • Saint Mary Magdalen
  • Sonitus Sanctus
  • Southern-Fried Catholicism
  • St. Conleth's Catholic Heritage Association
  • Stony Creek Digest
  • Testosterhome
  • The Ark and the Dove
  • The B-Movie Catechism
  • The Crescat
  • The Daily Eudemon
  • The Digital Hairshirt
  • The Four Pillars
  • The Inn at the End of the World
  • The Ironic Catholic
  • The Lady in the Pew
  • The Lion and the Cardinal
  • The New Liturgical Movement
  • The Pulp.it
  • The Sacred Page
  • The Sci Fi Catholic
  • The Scratching Post
  • The Weight of Glory
  • The Wired Catholic
  • Two Catholic Men and a Blog
  • Unam Sanctam Catholicam
  • Video meliora, proboque; Deteriora sequor
  • Vivificat
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • RSS

@2026 - www.splendoroftruth.com/curtjester. All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by PenciDesign


Back To Top