The Curt Jester
  • Home
  • About
  • Rome Depot
  • WikiCatechism
  • Free Catholic eBooks
  • Home
  • About
  • Rome Depot
  • WikiCatechism
  • Free Catholic eBooks

The Curt Jester

"It is the test of a good religion whether you can joke about it." GKC

Book Review

To Save a Thousand Souls

by Jeffrey Miller March 17, 2010March 18, 2010
written by Jeffrey Miller

For a thorough handbook for discerning priesthood “To save a thousand souls” is a great title.  Fortunately the book lives up to the title in that it is both a serious and worthwhile guide to those thinking about and further discerning a call to the priesthood.

As the author points out int the book, this is for those specifically  discerning the Diocesan priesthood.  I would suggest that even those who are looking at becoming a priest in a religious order also take a look at this book since it so well illustrates what the diocesan priesthood is — plus a lot of the advice would apply to them also.

Even as a layman reading this book there is a lot to recommend in it.  I really loved the first chapter “This is Just What Priests Do!” as it tells stories out of the lives of Diocesan priests.  As the book progresses it touches on the theology of the priesthood and the issue of what is a vocation in the first place.  Fr. Brett Brannen takes great care for the most part in explaining what a vocation is and what indeed is all of our primary vocations — to grow in holiness.  As he mentions, so often vocation is talked about in reference to the priesthood only and not the callings to consecrated and married life.

Fr. Brett Brannen has taken his wealth of experience to answer all those questions that someone discerning the priesthood is bound to have.  He also provides solid spiritual advice along the way to help in this discernment and how to develop the spiritual life of prayer.  Several chapters address this specifically, but the topic is integral to both discernment and to what happens after the man decides he is being called to the priesthood.

There is tons of practical advice spread throughout the book and presented quite simply.  One of the best parts of the book are the multiple stories from both his personal experience and from many others in regard to both discernment and being a priest.  Fr. Brett Brannen provides lots of clarity and he doesn’t just rollover difficult questions.  The book is solidly orthodox and the chapter titled “Celibacy, Chastity, Charity, and Cheerfulness” presents the subject of celibacy forthrightly and also goes into the Vatican document regarding proposed seminarians and same-sex attraction. This chapter was especially well written in regards to sexual integration and what might disqualify someone from the priesthood.  The topic of masturbation is also addressed in some detail.  Another chapter addresses prerequisites and impediments to the priesthood.

There is also a lot of important information such as what is seminary like and a look a the day to day life as a seminarian along with the educational requirements.  The types of assignments a Diocesan priest might experience and a look at ordination day are other important chapters.

In close to 400 pages I only had one quibble with this book.  The chapter on vocations talked of the single life led in generosity as a specific vocation.  I don’t believe that this is something the Church has really taught.  Mary Beth Bonachi wrote an article on this previously that she could find “no mention of an unconsecrated single “vocation” in Church teaching anywhere” and references Mulieris Dignitatem and notes John Paul II says that God calls all women to give themselves in one of two ways — in motherhood or in consecration to Christ. No mention of singleness in there. Though maybe this is an area that will be developed more fully by the Church in the future.  Often though I get the feeling people talk about the single life itself as a vocation to keep from hurting feelings. But I am not close to being an expert or really a fully informed layman on this subject.

Like I said I had just the one quibble and otherwise I think this book would make a great resource throughout the Church to help those in discernment and to give much good advice to others that want to help promote vocations to the Diocesan priesthood.  Besides as a thorough handbook on the subject people don’t have to read it cover to cover, but could also use it as a handy reference — especially with the question index in the back.  This book has also been praised by many people such as the always reliable Fr. Benedict J. Groeschel, C.F.R. and others with a solid reputation.

Available via Vianney Vocations

Update: I found out that the book originally included in the section whether there was indeed a single vocation. They took the section out since the theology is still developing. So I guess I am now quibble free.

March 17, 2010March 18, 2010 7 comments
0 FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
Punditry

Here we go again

by Jeffrey Miller March 17, 2010
written by Jeffrey Miller
  • A non-Catholic, far left, pro-contraception speaker who’s said we don’t need to ban aborting babies and who’s advised U.S. senators and representatives on how to get believers to vote for pro-gay, pro-abortion Democrats
  • A laicized priest who dissents from “a wide range of Church teachings” and wants women priests and women bishops
  • A nun who called Catholic doctrine against non-marital sex “a fixation.”
  • A Catholic priest who told the 2005 REC that “we” need “public models” of “healthy gay priests for Catholics to reflect on.”

source

So where are these dissidents speaking?

  1. Call To Action Conference
  2. Voice of the Faithful Meeting
  3. Generic conference of gray haired dissenters nostalgic for the sixties
  4. LA Archdiocese’s 2010 Religious Education Congress

Well all of the above would probably be an acceptable write-in answer, but if you selected #4 you are correct. With Cardinal Mahony recently passing his 74th birthday we can hope and pray that any such conference in the future will not be the dissident fest they tend to be.

To be fair though there is usually some token Catholics actually faithful to the Magisterium that speak there or are involved with the conference.  The attendees range across the spectrum as do the exhibitors.

I must admit though that it is often fun looking at the list of workshops and playing spot the heretic.  I pretty much always hit pay dirt when doing so.  This time the very first person I looked up giving a workshop is Barbar Fiand, SND de N.  Her writings are rather odd to say the least.  For example her view of the Eucharist is that it is the “event of the Community”  and “presensing” and downplays transubstantiations as being introduced late and influenced by Aristotalian philosophy.  She even says the prefers the view of the Eucharist as “spiritual refreshment” as opposed to the Eucharist being the very Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Jesus.

Her reflections in response to the USCCB document on the Reiki which called this new age practice as “unscientific and inappropriate for Catholic institutions” is unintentionally hilarious.  She says the Bishop’s view is the result of the Hellenic perspective of reality and goes on.

The distinctions of matter and mind, so important to the dualism of the past 2000 years, disappear in the universe of today’s physics which we might best describe as a sea of vibrations under-girded and informed by what scientists today identify in various ways, most commonly: the pure vacuum – the non-visible, pure emptiness of the “zero point field.” The “implicate order” (David Bohm – physicist), the “unified field of pure consciousness” (John Hagelin – physicist), the morphogenetic field (Rupert Sheldrake – biologist), space-time foam, empty fullness, fecund nothingness (Brian Swimme) are other references to the same.

I guess the USCCB forget to remember that Quantum foam and subatomic spacetime turbulence of the order of Planck length when addressing the subject of Reiki. How could they have overlooked the works of John Hagelin who led the Transcendental Meditation movement which charged fees for instructions and sold professional mantras.  I do love the phrase “fecund nothingness”  as a sort of response to ex nihilo.  In fact fecund nothingness is the perfect metaphor for so much progressive theology. Plus there is her defense of shamanism.  So with her background who else would you have picked for a workshop on “Christian Vision.”

For the workshop on how Catholics should vote they have Richard R. Gaillardetz, PhD who who apparently supports homosexual acts, women’s ordination,  has a quite flawed view of the structure of the early Church and a narrow view on papal infallibility and the magisterium.  His book on marriage supports following your conscience on contraception.  His book also mentions  how he ran into a former classmate who was brilliant in college and now she was married with kids and he couldn’t help but feel sorry that she “sold out” and stopped using her God given mind.”  The title of one of his workshops in Rochester was “Getting Beyond Dominating Hierarchy.”

Plus of couse what Religious Education conference would be complete with out famous dissident Ronald Rolheiser, OMI who has written of St Therese being tormented on her “celibate cot.”

Or how about Father Bryan Massingale, STD who wrote an essay against voting for a marriage amendment defining marriage. Another one of the Marquette moral theologians. Or maybe Dr. Megan McKenna Call To Action speaker who calls abortion “individual freedom of choice” and the current abortion law “in favor of individual rights and responsibilities.” Then there is Fr. Richard Rohr a return favorite of the religious conferencef, another Call to Action speakers, supporter of the Enneagram, defender of homosexual acts, attacker of the hierarchy and those who actually hold to Church dogma and doctrine. Add in a heap of syncretism and practically Pagan male spirituality and you have another fine workshop teacher.

And that is just taking a quick look at day one of the conference.  Funny out of the dozen or so Catholic nuns speaking that first day they couldn’t even find one that wore a habit.  Oh well that is just the nostalgic male in me wanting to impose clothing restrictions on women religious or something.

There are some speakers there I would certainly like to see such as Fr. Tad. Pacholczyk, Lisa Hendley, John Allen Jr., and no doubt some others I am not familiar with. Plus I wouldn’t mind seeing the two-man acoustic, humor, rock group Popple again – who really make me laugh.

The problem of course is the extent of the infection of workshops by people who have no business trying to impart the Catholic faith to anybody – until they learn it themselves.  That might seem a bit harsh, but allowing people who teach heresy and the promotion of intrinsic evils at a convention aimed at religious education is beyond the pale.  Certainly this conference reflects Cardinal Mahony, but many other diocese have long sent people there to attend this event.  It is like outsourcing your shepherds to wolves.  I have not even addressed the liturgies that go on there which don’t exactly reflect the Pope’s view on liturgy and often does not even follow liturgical documents.

Well here is hoping that this is the last year that I write about this travesty that has lead way to many astray by giving dissidents a diocesan seal of approval.

March 17, 2010 9 comments
0 FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
Pro-life

Thanks for the clarity

by Jeffrey Miller March 16, 2010March 17, 2010
written by Jeffrey Miller

Way to often in regards to the USCCB I have a “What the heck?” moment.  Whether it is movie reviews, continuous CCHD scandals, or of course the Catholic News Service an organ of the USCCB.  Though mostly it now CCHD and CNS that come to mind.

I present as the latest bit of evidence against CNS the article CHA backs health bill; bishops reiterate objection to abortion wording by Nancy Frazier O’Brien.

When I first read this article yesterday it annoyed me.  Subsequent re-reads have not exactly dampened that enjoyment.  When I first read the headline I thought “Good CNS is noting that CHA is backing the Senate version of the bill.”  Though the headline is rather sloppy and could be read in multiple ways. Reading the headline you might not understand that the CHA is taking a position opposite to the USCCB . But headlines often don’t provide a useful summary anyway and you have to read the article.

Unfortunately reading the article did not provide the clarity I hoped for.  In fact it much reminded me of the typical America Magazine take where you give both sides as if it was a neutral question.

To my mind it was presented as if the CHA and Cardinal George speaking for the USCCB had just a difference of opinion.  The tone of the article gives you no real idea that the Senate version of the bill will provide Federal dollars for abortion and that the CHA is willing to support it anyway.  Though of course CHA denies that it does provide funding and is willing to believe the accounting tricks used to try to pretend this is so.  In this article Sr.. Keehan is allowed to make claims that have already been adequately fact checked and rebutted by the USCCB.

Now we go from bad to worst.

The USCCB has already issued a rebuttal to Timothy Stolfzfus Jost objections to what the USCCB had been saying.

The USCCB analysis was directed at the points raised by Timothy Stolfzfus Jost, a law professor at the Washington and Lee University School of Law and co-author of a casebook widely used in the teaching of health law, in a March 11 article in The Hill newspaper.

“In our judgment, … the Jost analysis is wrong in most of its major claims,” the USCCB response said. “The Senate bill’s major flaws are as real as ever and must be addressed.”

Jost responded to the USCCB statement with a seven-page memorandum March 14 that said the Senate bill is “far more pro-life than the (USCCB pro-life) secretariat acknowledges, as has now been recognized by the Catholic Health Association and other pro-life organizations, leaders and theologians.”

“The Senate bill is essentially as pro-life as the House bill, indeed more so on some issues,” Jost said. “Pro-life members of Congress should, therefore, be supportive of the Senate bill.”

First notice how use of the CHA is now providing cover for the bill. Other pro-life organizations are not named because any actual pro-life group is against the bill. Plus of course you can always find a theologian to suit your cause. Heck you can probably order a theologian from Catholic Theological Society of America like you would a pizza to suit your needs.

To believe that the Senate bill is just as pro-life as the Senate bill you would have to believe that:

  • Their was no reason at all for pro-abortion lobbyists to oppose the Stupak Amendment in the House.
  • The failure to have a similar provision to the Stupak Amendment in the Senate bill meant absolutely nothing.
  • NARAL opposed the Stupak and Nelson measure for no reason.  No reason that they labeled any attempt at removing Federal funding of abortion as “outrageous” and a threat to “abortion coverage.”
  • The Senate and House bills are essentially the same but for some odd reason Nancy Pelosi can’t get the votes to pass the bill. Why did she have to stop negotiating with Rep. Stupak?
  • There was not reason to buy off Sens. Nelson and Landrieu  since the Senate bill was the same as the House bill.
  • Non-partisan FactCheck.org got it totally wrong when they agreed that the bill would provide Federal money for abortion and that Secretary Kathleen Sebelius would be authorized to pay for them.
  • All of the Congressman both Republicans and Democrats who oppose the Senate version of the bill because of the issue of Federally funding abortion have no idea what the bill actually says and they are being contrary for no reason at all.

Timothy Jost writing elsewhere said that if the Democrats can’t pass this bill “they are not fit to govern”. He has been supportive of the so-called heath care reform from the beginning and has been dismissive about abortion concerns.

Yet this is the voice CNS gives so much time to and the last word in the article.

Deal Hudson has similar concerns to my own and points out some problems.

March 16, 2010March 17, 2010 2 comments
0 FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
Punditry

Culture of Death Stations of the Cross

by Jeffrey Miller March 15, 2010
written by Jeffrey Miller

This year, the Catholic Campaign for Human Development (CCHD) released its own version of this ancient devotion. This self-promotion offers a few scriptural passages relevant to each of the 14 Stations of the Cross (Jesus is Condemned to Death, Jesus Takes up His Cross, Jesus Falls the First Time, etc.), which are followed by commercial commentaries on groups receiving grant money from the CCHD. Even the prayers at the end of each station are tainted with these commercial insertions.

But the most horrifying aspect of this “prayerful reflection” is that several of the grantees that are given equal attention as Our Lord in His Dolorous Passion are involved in the promotion of abortion and/or same-sex marriage.

Besides the fact that using the Stations of the Cross in this manner is a bit tasteless, when used to promote groups who dissent against Church teaching it becomes exactly part of that sin that put Jesus on cross in the first place.

Thankfully there is some good news on this in that they have now been removed.

“We’re happy to see the USCCB respond quickly to clean the offensive material from its web site,” said Michael Hichborn, lead researcher on the CCHD for American Life League, an RCN member. “We hope and pray this is the first step in cleaning up the larger problem of the CCHD funding organizations that support abortion and same-sex marriage.”

The CCHD’s revision of the Stations of the Cross was the latest incident exposed by the 21-member RCN coalition’s campaign to end CCHD funding for organizations promoting philosophies and/or activities contrary to Catholic teaching.

What gets me is that obviously CCHD is award they are being closely monitored and yet they still do something as wacky as this.

Reform CCHD Now

March 15, 2010 8 comments
0 FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
Punditry

The E.R. Myth

by Jeffrey Miller March 15, 2010
written by Jeffrey Miller

The uninsured, it’s said, use emergency rooms for primary care. That’s expensive and ineffective. Once they’re insured, they’ll have regular doctors. Care will improve; costs will decline. Everyone wins. Great argument. Unfortunately, it’s untrue.

A study by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation found that the insured accounted for 83 percent of emergency-room visits, reflecting their share of the population. After Massachusetts adopted universal insurance, emergency-room use remained higher than the national average, an Urban Institute study found. More than two-fifths of visits represented non-emergencies. Of those, a majority of adult respondents to a survey said it was “more convenient” to go to the emergency room or they couldn’t “get [a doctor’s] appointment as soon as needed.” If universal coverage makes appointments harder to get, emergency-room use may increase. [Robert J. Samuelson]

Well I could have told them the same thing.  Throughout my military career and my subsequent experience with Naval Hospitals as a retiree – the Emergency Room is always full and the majority of cases are non-emergencies.  Active duty personnel and their families of course do not pay for health care coverage and yet they use the E.R. casually when they could in fact have made an appointment to being seen during the day.  For some it is more convenient for them to go to the E.R. after hours then to take off from work with a regular appointment – even though the E.R. wait is much longer.

This has always been one of my pet peeves in that I use the E.R. only for serious situations or when directed by the appointment line to go to the E.R. instead.

Though in part the same was for the regular sick call in the Navy in that a majority of people would show up for trivial health issues that could have been easily treated with over the counter medicine.  When it is available and free people are more likely to use it – which is just common sense born out by my own experience.  It took me ten years in the Navy before I visited a Navy Clinic for treatment.  They asked me where the rest of my medical record was since they couldn’t believe it was my first time in.  I am pretty sure I am in the minority of only using healthcare when actually needed.

Ramesh Ponnuru

March 15, 2010 10 comments
0 FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
Punditry

Getting closer to Easter

by Jeffrey Miller March 15, 2010March 15, 2010
written by Jeffrey Miller

Yes you can tell it is getting closer to Easter just by the Television schedule.

Who Framed Jesus?

TV-PG (V)

For two thousand years, blame for the murder of Jesus has rested squarely on the shoulders of Judas Iscariot and the Jewish High Priest. This gritty crime thriller exposes all-new suspects and asks whether we have condemned the wrong men?

Ah yes the Discovery Channel a bastion of Christian orthodoxy which like the History Channel usually has some nice bit to challenge Christians during Easter.

But the question “Who framed Jesus?” is a valid one. Though it has a simple answer. As a sinner I framed Jesus. In fact all of us can stand up with a Spartacus moment and say “I framed Jesus.” He died for our sins and I guess to provide programming for the Discovery Channel.

On the other hand when it comes down to it, nobody framed Jesus.  Jesus was persecuted because he was the Messiah.  While some bore false witness against him in the trial the real charge that he claimed to be the Messiah and the Son of God was indeed true.  Jesus’ answer to the High Priest affirmed this, and the High Priest subsequently tore his robes in response.  Indeed he was guilty of being the Messiah and in no way framed.  People used political manipulation to have Jesus tried – but the main charge was indeed true.

March 15, 2010March 15, 2010 4 comments
0 FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
Pro-life

Mess of healthcare pottage

by Jeffrey Miller March 15, 2010
written by Jeffrey Miller

His Awesomeness Archbishop Chaput

Groups, trade associations and publications describing themselves as “Catholic” or “prolife” that endorse the Senate version — whatever their intentions — are doing a serious disservice to the nation and to the Church, undermining the witness of the Catholic community; and ensuring the failure of genuine, ethical health-care reform. By their public actions, they create confusion at exactly the moment Catholics need to think clearly about the remaining issues in the health-care debate. They also provide the illusion of moral cover for an unethical piece of legislation.

“I will trade you a mess of healthcare pottage for the birthright of the unborn.” Groups like the Catholic Health Association have decided that the immoral Senate bill is now acceptable and should be supported. Whatever their motives are their reasoning is deeply flawed in supporting this bill and pretending that it does not pay for abortion.  These modern Esau’s are making a bad deal for something they assume to be a good.  Esau at least gave away his birthright which was his own to give.  The modern Esau’s give away somebody else’s birthright.  The Archbishop is exactly right about the faux moral cover they provide which helps to give pro-abortion politicians some credence – this is pure cooperation with evil.

…The long, unpleasant and too often dishonest national health-care debate is now in its last days. Its most painful feature has been those “Catholic” groups that by their eagerness for some kind of deal undercut the witness of the Catholic community and help advance a bad bill into a bad law. Their flawed judgment could now have damaging consequences for all of us.

Do not be misled. The Senate version of health-care reform currently being pushed ahead by congressional leaders and the White House — despite public resistance and numerous moral concerns — is bad law; and not simply bad, but dangerous. It does not deserve, nor does it have, the support of the Catholic bishops in our country, who speak for the believing Catholic community. In its current content, the Senate version of health-care legislation is not “reform.”  Catholics and other persons of good will concerned about the foundations of human dignity should oppose it.

Exactly right – funding of abortion is not reform.

Kathryn Jean Lopez

March 15, 2010 2 comments
0 FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
Punditry

HuffPo defense of Pope Benedict XVI

by Jeffrey Miller March 14, 2010March 14, 2010
written by Jeffrey Miller

In the Huffington Post is a rousing defense of Pope Benedict XVI and Pope Pius XII and their relations with the Jewish people.

You might think you have entered the Twilight Zone but perusing the comments show you that you are in the same universe. As you would expect in the comment section you get the ill-informed rants that will dismiss all evidence and trump it with “SEXUAL ABUSE OF MINORS BY PRIESTS!!!!!!!!”  Well at least we know where the Know-Nothings went. Funny how the same crowd that would demand you put the words alleged in front of any murderer or terrorist see all priests as guilty immediately.

To this I refer to Anderson’s Law.

Catholic blogger Jay Anderson reacted by proposing a Catholic equivalent to the Internet rule known as Godwin’s Law “for invocations of ‘the Scandal’ as a rhetorical device.”

“It would go something like this: ‘As a debate involving the Catholic Church (either a discussion about the Church specifically, or a discussion in which the Church is taking a position) grows longer, the probability of someone mentioning the sex scandal approaches one.’

“And then there’s its corollary: ‘Once such reference to the Scandal is made, whoever mentioned the Scandal has automatically “lost” whatever debate was in progress,’

Unfortunately we are seeing Anderson’s Law in effect pretty much daily.

Yesterday Jimmy Akin put the smack down on the irresponsible reporting that Pope Benedict transferred a paedophile preist.  This type of reporting always reminds me of the attack on bloggers that they don’t have editors to hold them accountable.” Yes the editor of the TimesOnline really checked the facts on this one.

In related news Sandro Magister prints an Interview with the CDF’s “prosecutor” of priests who commit “graviora delicta”, via Father Z

Hat tip to Londiniensis on Twitter and Joanna Bogle on the HuffPo article.

March 14, 2010March 14, 2010 6 comments
0 FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
Punditry

Laetare Sunday

by Jeffrey Miller March 14, 2010
written by Jeffrey Miller

A parody post from a few years back:

The 4th Sunday of Lent is also known as Laetare Sunday, but many people are unaware of the problems of many people on this Sunday in Lent. Some people especially men experience gastrointestinal upset and skin problems at the site of priests wearing apparently pink vestments. Telling them that these vestments are actually suppose to be Rose colored to rejoice in Christ’s redemption to look up and see the first rays of Easter is of no avail. Regardless of any efforts to explain why a Rose is appropriate they still see pink vestments. This condition is known as Laetare Intolerance and the sufferers are Laetare sensitive.

Unto now there was no help for those affected by Laetare Intolerance.

Introducing Vestmints made of pure organically grown herb mentha. Mint was originally used as a medicinal herb to treat stomach ache and nothing could be better for those who get queasy over apparently pink vestments. Laetare Intolerance does not have to change affect your active participation in the Mass, but you will be able to pray actively with the best of them.

Just take one tablet before the hour fast before Mass and you will not have any of those annoying feelings. You will soon "O be joyful" just as Laetare originally means.

Vestmints does not work for everybody in all situation without additional help. Some vestments worn are so pink that you think instantly of Pepto Bismal and wish you had some for your queasy stomach. That is why each bottle of Vestmints includes a coupon for a free set of Rose colored glasses. The use of Rose colored glasses with Vestmints is highly effective in these situations that otherwise could result in pink eye.

Even better news is that those who suffer with Laetare Intolerance also often suffer from Gaudette Intolerance on the third Sunday of Advent and Vestmints has been proven to work on both Sundays. Thus killing two Sundays with one pill.

Vestmints can also be used for other severe vestment allergic reactions such as to rainbow stoles, vestments out of the seventies, or ones approved by Archbishop Piero Marini.

Remember though to see your doctor first before taking Vestmints to ensure you have a vestment related illness. He will take a stole sample and can give you the results immediately.

March 14, 2010 6 comments
0 FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
Movies

Finding Fatima

by Jeffrey Miller March 11, 2010
written by Jeffrey Miller

A companion documentary from the people who created the movie “The 13th Day”

March 11, 2010 3 comments
0 FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
Newer Posts
Older Posts

About Me

Jeff Miller is a former atheist who after spending forty years in the wilderness finds himself with both astonishment and joy a member of the Catholic Church. This award-winning blog presents my hopefully humorous and sometimes serious take on things religious, political, and whatever else crosses my mind.

Conversion story

  • Catholic Answers Magazine
  • Coming Home Network

Appearances on:

  • The Journey Home
  • Hands On Apologetics (YouTube)
  • Catholic RE.CON.

Blogging since July 2002

Recent Posts

  • The Weekly Leo

  • A Litany of Gratitude

  • The Spiritual Life and Memes

  • What is your distance from Jesus on the Cross?

  • Feast of St. Thomas, Apostle

  • Gratitude and Generosity

  • “The Heart and Center of Catholicism”

  • Post-Lent Report

  • Stay in your lane

  • Echoing through creation

  • Another Heaven

  • My Year in Books – 2024 Edition

  • I Have a Confession to Make

  • A Mandatory Take

  • Everybody is ignorant

  • Sacramental Disposal, LLC

  • TL;DH (Too Long;Didn’t Hear)

  • A Shop Mark Would Like

  • The Narrow Way Through the Sacred Heart of Jesus

  • Time Travel and Fixing Up Our Past

  • The Weekly Leo

  • The Weekly Leo

  • The Weekly Leo

  • The Weekly Leo

Meta

I also blog at Happy Catholic Bookshelf Entries RSS
Entries ATOM
Comments RSS
Email: curtjester@gmail.com

What I'm currently reading

Subscribe to The Curt Jester by Email

Endorsements

  • The Curt Jester: Disturbingly Funny --Mark Shea
  • EX-cellent blog --Jimmy Akin
  • One wag has even posted a list of the Top Ten signs that someone is in the grip of "motu-mania," -- John Allen Jr.
  • Brilliance abounds --Victor Lams
  • The Curt Jester is a blog of wise-ass musings on the media, politics, and things "Papist." The Revealer

Archives

About Me

Jeff Miller is a former atheist who after spending forty years in the wilderness finds himself with both astonishment and joy a member of the Catholic Church. This award winning blog presents my hopefully humorous and sometimes serious take on things religious, political, and whatever else crosses my mind.
My conversion story
  • The Curt Jester: Disturbingly Funny --Mark Shea
  • EX-cellent blog --Jimmy Akin
  • One wag has even posted a list of the Top Ten signs that someone is in the grip of "motu-mania," -- John Allen Jr.
  • Brilliance abounds --Victor Lams
  • The Curt Jester is a blog of wise-ass musings on the media, politics, and things "Papist." The Revealer

Meta

I also blog at Happy Catholic Bookshelf Twitter
Facebook
Entries RSS
Entries ATOM
Comments RSS 2.0" >RSS
Email: curtjester@gmail.com

What I'm currently reading

Subscribe to The Curt Jester by Email

Commercial Interuption

Podcasts

•Catholic Answers Live Subscribe to Podcast RSS
•Catholic Underground Subscribe to Podcast RSS
•Catholic Vitamins Subscribe to Podcast RSS
•EWTN (Multiple Podcasts) Subscribe to Podcast RSS
•Forgotten Classics Subscribe to Podcast RSS
•Kresta in the Afternoon Subscribe to Podcast RSS
•SQPN - Tons of great Catholic podcasts Subscribe to Podcast RSS
•The Catholic Hack Subscribe to Podcast RSS
•The Catholic Laboratory Subscribe to Podcast RSS
•The Catholics Next Door Subscribe to Podcast RSS
•What does the prayer really say? Subscribe to Podcast RSS

Archives

Catholic Sites

  • Big Pulpit
  • Capuchin Friars
  • Catholic Answers
  • Catholic Lane
  • Crisis Magazine
  • New Evangelizers
  • Waking Up Catholic

Ministerial Bloghood

  • A Jesuit’s Journey
  • A Shepherd’s Voice
  • Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam
  • Adam’s Ale
  • Archbishop Dolan
  • Bonfire of the Vanities
  • Cardinal Sean’s Blog
  • Da Mihi Animas
  • Domine, da mihi hanc aquam!
  • Father Joe
  • Fr. Roderick
  • Godzdogz
  • Laus Crucis
  • Omne Quod Spirat, Laudet Dominum
  • Orthometer
  • Priests for Life
  • Servant and Steward
  • Standing on My Head
  • The hermeneutic of continuity
  • This Week at Vatican II
  • Waiting in Joyful Hope
  • What Does The Prayer Really Say?

Bloghood of the Faithful

  • A Catholic Mom Climbing the Pillars
  • A Catholic Mom in Hawaii
  • A Long Island Catholic
  • A Wing And A Prayer
  • Acts of the Apostasy
  • Ad Altare Dei
  • AdoroTeDevote
  • Against the Grain
  • Aggie Catholics
  • Aliens in this world
  • Always Catholic
  • American Chesterton Society
  • American Papist
  • Among Women
  • And Sometimes Tea
  • Ask Sister Mary Martha
  • auntie joanna writes
  • Bad Catholic
  • Bethune Catholic
  • Big C Catholics
  • Bl. Thaddeus McCarthy's Catholic Heritage Association
  • Catholic and Enjoying It!
  • Catholic Answers Blog
  • Catholic Fire
  • Catholic New Media Roundup
  • Charlotte was Both
  • Christus Vincit
  • Confessions of a Hot Carmel Sundae
  • Cor ad cor loquitur
  • Courageous Priest
  • Creative Minority Report
  • CVSTOS FIDEI
  • Dads Called to Holiness
  • Darwin Catholic
  • Defend us in Battle
  • Defenders of the Catholic Faith
  • Disputations
  • Divine Life
  • Domenico Bettinelli Jr.
  • Dominican Idaho
  • Dyspectic Mutterings
  • Ecce Homo
  • Ecclesia Militans
  • Eve Tushnet
  • Eye of the Tiber
  • feminine-genius
  • Five Feet of Fury
  • Flying Stars
  • For The Greater Glory
  • Get Religion
  • GKC’s Favourite
  • God’s Wonderful Love
  • Gray Matters
  • Happy Catholic
  • Ignatius Insight Scoop
  • In Dwelling
  • In the Light of the Law
  • InForum Blog
  • Jeff Cavins
  • Jimmy Akin
  • John C. Wright
  • La Salette Journey
  • Laudem Gloriae
  • Lex Communis
  • Life is a Prayer
  • Man with Black Hat
  • Maria Lectrix
  • Mary Meets Dolly
  • MONIALES OP
  • Mulier Fortis
  • Musings of a Pertinacious Papist
  • My Domestic Church
  • Nunblog
  • Oblique House
  • Open wide the doors to Christ!
  • Over the Rhine and Into the Tiber
  • Patrick Madrid
  • Pro Ecclesia * Pro Familia * Pro Civitate
  • Recta Ratio
  • Saint Mary Magdalen
  • Sonitus Sanctus
  • Southern-Fried Catholicism
  • St. Conleth's Catholic Heritage Association
  • Stony Creek Digest
  • Testosterhome
  • The Ark and the Dove
  • The B-Movie Catechism
  • The Crescat
  • The Daily Eudemon
  • The Digital Hairshirt
  • The Four Pillars
  • The Inn at the End of the World
  • The Ironic Catholic
  • The Lady in the Pew
  • The Lion and the Cardinal
  • The New Liturgical Movement
  • The Pulp.it
  • The Sacred Page
  • The Sci Fi Catholic
  • The Scratching Post
  • The Weight of Glory
  • The Wired Catholic
  • Two Catholic Men and a Blog
  • Unam Sanctam Catholicam
  • Video meliora, proboque; Deteriora sequor
  • Vivificat
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • RSS

@2026 - www.splendoroftruth.com/curtjester. All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by PenciDesign


Back To Top