The Curt Jester
  • Home
  • About
  • Rome Depot
  • WikiCatechism
  • Free Catholic eBooks
  • Home
  • About
  • Rome Depot
  • WikiCatechism
  • Free Catholic eBooks

The Curt Jester

"It is the test of a good religion whether you can joke about it." GKC

Punditry

Media Vatican reporting is a lot like those “Bad Lip Reading” videos

by Jeffrey Miller December 22, 2012
written by Jeffrey Miller

Gay marriage threatens family ‘to its foundations’, says Pope

Pope says future of mankind at stake over gay marriage

Pope Benedict XVI denounces gay marriage in his Christmas message saying ‘manipulation of nature’ will put future of mankind at stake

And many other headlines playing fast in loose with a cut and paste

He made the comments in his annual Christmas address to the Vatican bureaucracy, one of his most important speeches of the year.

You know an article is going to be really fair when the Roman Curia is called the Vatican Bureaucracy. Though that is fair enough. Really all political reporting should refer to politicians addressing the bureaucracy whether of state, federal, parliamentary, etc stripe.

Still the annual address to Roman Curia being described as one of the Pope’s most important speeches of the year is quite odd and really pure hyperbole. Why is it considered one of the most important speeches of the year? Because the reporter says it is.

The great joy with which families from all over the world congregated in Milan indicates that, despite all impressions to the contrary, the family is still strong and vibrant today. But there is no denying the crisis that threatens it to its foundations – especially in the western world. It was noticeable that the Synod repeatedly emphasized the significance, for the transmission of the faith, of the family as the authentic setting in which to hand on the blueprint of human existence. This is something we learn by living it with others and suffering it with others. So it became clear that the question of the family is not just about a particular social construct, but about man himself – about what he is and what it takes to be authentically human. The challenges involved are manifold. First of all there is the question of the human capacity to make a commitment or to avoid commitment. Can one bind oneself for a lifetime? Does this correspond to man’s nature? Does it not contradict his freedom and the scope of his self-realization? Does man become himself by living for himself alone and only entering into relationships with others when he can break them off again at any time? Is lifelong commitment antithetical to freedom? Is commitment also worth suffering for? Man’s refusal to make any commitment – which is becoming increasingly widespread as a result of a false understanding of freedom and self-realization as well as the desire to escape suffering – means that man remains closed in on himself and keeps his “I” ultimately for himself, without really rising above it. Yet only in self-giving does man find himself, and only by opening himself to the other, to others, to children, to the family, only by letting himself be changed through suffering, does he discover the breadth of his humanity. When such commitment is repudiated, the key figures of human existence likewise vanish: father, mother, child – essential elements of the experience of being human are lost.

While certainly the Holy Father is referencing the crisis that affects marriage, it goes a little far to see this totally in the light of just same-sex “marriage.” It goes deeper than that with divorce, single parenthood, and other deconstructions of the family. You can see this by the simple fact that the Pope is talking about attitudes in actual marriage of lifelong commitment and the false idea of freedom. The idea of self-giving and sacrifice in the face of an individualistic view of marriage where love is a feeling that can pass and not the willing of the good for the other. There is a crisis that goes way beyond same-sex “marriage” that has crippled family life and in fact made the way for the view of marriage that made same-sex “marriage” seem to be the same thing. The Pope does go on to talk about the new philosophy of sexuality that is a profound falsehood and what I would call the “dictatorship of sexual relativity” to mangle a phrase from the Holy Father.

In the Pope’s Message for the World Day of Peace he did specifically talk about same-sex “marriage’.

There is also a need to acknowledge and promote the natural structure of marriage as the union of a man and a woman in the face of attempts to make it juridically equivalent to radically different types of union; such attempts actually harm and help to destabilize marriage, obscuring its specific nature and its indispensable role in society.

This led to a small protest in St. Peter square by activists. It always seems to surprise them that the Church has not yet become a proponent of homosexual acts and a sterile view of marriage. The Church has become like the prophets of old. Proclaiming the truth to a generation that does not want to hear it. Although the call to repentance is a call we can all be rather deaf to.

This was a part of his World Day of Peace message that I had highlighted when I previously read it.

“The precondition for peace is the dismantling of the dictatorship of relativism and of the supposition of a completely autonomous morality which precludes acknowledgment of the ineluctable natural moral law inscribed by God upon the conscience of every man and woman.”

December 22, 2012 3 comments
0 FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
Book Review

What Jesus Really Said about the End of the World

by Jeffrey Miller December 21, 2012December 21, 2012
written by Jeffrey Miller

It is rather understandable when nonbelievers and skeptics look at the New Testament and come to an understanding that follows from a framework of doubt and skepticism. It is quite another for believers to take the exact same approach and to undermine reasons for faith. There is certainly a role to play for Christians as St. Paul said to “Test all things” and as St. Peter said to “Always be prepared to offer a reason for the hope that is within you.” Yet we get things like Jesus didn’t know he was God, that the miracle of the feeding of the multitude was one of sharing, and that Jesus and the Apostles expected the end if the world within their generation.

What flows from such misunderstandings is that doubt is cast onto Jesus and his Church as a result. Author David Currie had heard a Catholic college women saying that since Jesus was wrong about the time of the second advent that Jesus and thus the Church was wrong about other things such as abortion and contraception. The only good thing about such a serious misunderstanding is that it one of the impetus that caused David Currie to write a book on the subject.

What Jesus Really Said about the End of the World

It is one of those wonderful ironies of life that I finished David Currie’s new book What Jesus Really Said about the End of the World last night and am writing a review on the day of the much hyped Maya apocalypse. Although the fact that I read it during Advent is much more pertinent.  This season that celebrates both the coming of Jesus in the incarnation and his future coming in the second advent.

This book illustrates how both the skeptics such as Bertrand Russell and the believers such C.S. Lewis could come to believe that Jesus and the Apostles were wrong about this specific subject.  I have heard this idea multiple times myself and certain scriptural passages in isolation can appear to bear this out.   I had already come to understand the idea that scripture can have multiple fulfillments such as in the book of Revelation where some events were relating to the persecution of that time and to the final eschaton.  Multiple fulfillments really are quite common in scripture and I had thought that this same understanding would also apply to what Jesus and the Apostles said in this regard.

This book certainly has this understanding, but it really goes into detail to show how this is true and to break out when Jesus was talking about the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem and when we was talking about his second coming.  I was enthralled from the beginning and David Currie brought out components of scripture that really put these ideas into perspective and focus.

A large part of the book deals with the Gospel of Matthew and the olivet discourse where much of what we know on this topic is found.  One of the errors we often make is to bring our ideas of learning and teaching and assume that the same had always been true.  This error leads us to miss things that would have been apparent to a culture with primarily an oral teaching tradition that relied on a practiced memory since written forms of communication were both time consuming and expensive.  I was fascinated to learn of things like bracketing were used where a subject would be bracketed by the same phrase to draw attention to what was in between and to set it apart.  The whole structure of the olivet discourse and the somewhat parallels readings in Luke are rather amazing and once you understand this structure it provides the key to when Jesus was talking about the destruction of the Temple or the end of the world.

I would go into more technical details of this structure, but really I could only provide a poor summary and I would really encourage you to read it in this book.  What you do find though is that Jesus answered the Apostles regarding these two questions and the two answers can be totally separated out leaving no doubt as to which scriptural replies matched up to what event.  There were also other keys provided as to understand that there are really multiple comings of Christ which this book lays out. In fact the case is so destructive to the skeptics and the points made make it difficult to see how people could be confused about Jesus saying his second advent would be delayed.

While this book takes almost totally a scriptural approach there are references to the understanding of the Early Church Fathers which match and provide emphasis on how the ideas presented in this book are not new ones. So much of what the Church already knew gets lost over the years as people come up with ideas divorced from the past.  I remember Scott Hahn once talking about coming up with a thrilling interpretation only to find it taught by the Church all along.

I thought David Currie did a masterful presentation on the subject and it will forever change the way I look at these passages now with greater insight. I highly recommend this book to a general audience as it is not just some dry scholarly tome. Scholarly certainly, but well worthwhile reading. The final summary also brings these ideas down to a personal level and how we are to relate to them.

<Insert mandatory REM reference to ” I read What Jesus Really Said about the End of the World and I feel fine”>

December 21, 2012December 21, 2012 1 comment
0 FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
Link

Giving and Receiving

by Jeffrey Miller December 20, 2012
written by Jeffrey Miller

From The Life with GQ blog.

GIVING and RECEIVING Holiday Giveaway is UNDERWAY!

GIVING: If you are able to, please consider donating a Walmart or Target eGift Card (anywhere from $5 to $20) for this holiday giveaway. To do this, leave a comment below indicating that you are “giving” and how much you are able to give. I will then send you the email address of someone in need when it becomes available.

RECEIVING: For those in need, simply leave a comment below (anonymous or not) telling something briefly about yourself and which gift card would be the most helpful for you. I will pass on your email information if there are participants on the giving end. Do not leave your email addresses in the comment section as I already have access to them.
This giveaway will run from now until Christmas. I will be “pearing” participants up (hence those pears up there) as they become available.

December 20, 2012 1 comment
0 FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
News

When conversions are a threat

by Jeffrey Miller December 19, 2012
written by Jeffrey Miller

BEIJING — Chinese leaders issued an order last year quietly directing universities to root out foreigners suspected of plotting against the Communist Party by converting students to Christianity.

The 16-page notice — obtained this month by a U.S.-based Christian group — uses language from the cold war era to depict a conspiracy by “overseas hostile forces” to infiltrate Chinese campuses under the guise of academic exchanges while their real intent is to use religion in “westernizing and dividing China.”

The document suggests that despite small signs of religious tolerance in recent decades, China’s ruling officials retain strong suspicion of religion as a tool of the West and a threat to the party’s authoritarian rule. And with the country’s top leadership in transition and looking to consolidate power, Chinese religious leaders worry that the stance is unlikely to change in the near future. [source]

No surprise here and over the last year we have seen the same kind of attitude displayed with China and Vatican relations with China taking more control of even the patriotic churches to keep them firmly under government control.

So glad to be living in a country with religious freedom. Well at least more religious freedom than China — for now.

December 19, 2012 7 comments
0 FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
HumorPunditry

Forcing my will on you to stop “bullying”

by Jeffrey Miller December 19, 2012December 19, 2012
written by Jeffrey Miller

Wow! How far has the world fallen? A group of parents in Missoula, Mont. are upset over the religious nature of Christmas songs performed at a local elementary school – alleging the songs about the Baby Jesus is unconstitutional and a “form of bullying.”

The parents, who declined to be identified, are threatening to sue the Missoula County Public School District unless songs like “Joy to the World” and “Good Christian Men Rejoice” are replaced with secular tunes. [Via Creative Minority Report]

I’m shocked, shocked I tell you. That there is a public school that was still singing actual Christmas carols is quite shocking. Especially how did “Good Christian Men” get past the inclusive language politically correct carols?

Although Christmas carols are quite dangerous and can have a delayed impact on the young mind. As a young atheist and throughout my life I have loved Christmas carols and specifically the traditional sacred carols. I had zero theological connection with them, but I knew their beauty musically and I reacted to that beauty. While I can enjoy the more seasonal Christmas songs that are more about climate and good feelings during this season (Christmasy songs), the traditional carols were always what I wanted to hear.

At one time you could turn on the radio and be certain to hear a good proportion of the sacred Christmas carols. As years have passed the stations that would play “Holiday” music were concentrating almost fully on the Christmasy songs. I remember once noting on a 24 hour Christmas music channel on a cable network that after a couples of days they played no traditional songs at all.

Wanting my traditional Christmas carol fix I had started to channel hop on the radio trying to find a station that played them. This led me to listening to Protestant radio and putting up with their between song messages. This in turn led me to the seeking phase of my conversion and devouring books at the library on the subject. The hit-and-run accident that had led me to question my atheist faith a couple of years priors had opened me up and of course God was providing me grace to see the world anew.

So atheist parents if you want your kids to grow up to be devout atheists please don’t let them become ritually unclean by listening to actual Christmas carols. Beauty is a devious trick of believers, sow watch out.

The above story though does remind me of a parody I did before:

hummers

PORTLAND, OR (Roto Reuters) A new children’s choir groups is getting lots of attention and bookings during the winter season. The Silent Night Seasonal Semi-Singers sidestep the problems inherent in a multi-cultural society and what has been called the “Christmas wars.” Secularists are upset with the lyrics of explicitly Christian carols and Christians become upset when these carols are left out. To solve this problem Ms. Giesel of the the Glencoe school elemenatary choir decided instead of hymns to do hums. Students are gagged while performing to ensure no actual Christian carols are ever sung. The instrumental portions of traditional Christmas carols are slightly altered to ensure no one in the audience might attempt to sing along. Silent Night is sung just as intended – totally silent. To ensure fairness winter holiday songs are also hummed.

Parents at first were hesitant to endorse the idea until they found out how enthusiastic their kids were. Now even students with no musical talent can join the choir and hum along. The provided humnal makes it very easy for kids to learn songs since they do not have to memorize any lyrics. When the audience is invited to join in and hum along nobody ever feels bad or put down since they don’t know the words or only know the first refrain.

The idea is catching on in neighborhoods where kids bundle up and go around the neighborhood from door to door humming or what some have called humoling. People are thrilled to find hummers at their door humming along to slightly familiar tunes invoking the winter season. So if you see a group of humolers approaching your door this season then open your door to the joys of holiday humoling.

December 19, 2012December 19, 2012 1 comment
0 FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
Punditry

Comparing Catholic and Geek Communities

by Jeffrey Miller December 17, 2012December 17, 2012
written by Jeffrey Miller

As someone who is both in the Catholic world and the geek world I make comparisons and contrasts between these two communities.

When it comes to the use of technology I find that the geek community is much more invested and active.  This fact at first blush would seem rather obvious that geeks take to new technologies and platforms quicker. Yet with the sheer number of Catholics in the world the fact that technology-focused communities have a larger and stronger presence is not a good sign.

One thing I had been thinking about is that there are many daily technology news podcasts.  These types of shows usually involve a group of people and bring on guests for specific technical knowledge. Yet there is really not one daily Catholic news show in this format.  Vatican Radio comes the closest and has a nice international perspective, but I grew tired of all the climate change coverage.  Al Kresta’s radio show which is also podcasted takes a couple of subjects each day to cover and I think does a good job with bringing in knowledgable guests.  Although this show also reruns previous shows rather often and so you don’t really get daily coverage.  Catholic Answers usually has a monthly show on Catholic news.  Rome Reports does a decent job of  daily video coverage of the Vatican. EWTN’s weekly “The World Over” also covers the news along with Raymond Arroyo’s interests.  The Good Catholic life podcast does cover daily news, but it more focused (as it should be) on diocesan happenings. The Catholic Underground weekly podcast has a nice “intersection of faith and culture” with both Catholic and tech news. Catholic Weekend also covers news of the day to some extent.  There are various more long form radio shows such as the Son Rise Morning Show and others that intersect into this area.  But really there are no daily wrap-up shows in the roughly 30 minute format with multiple commentators and guests able to weigh in on specific areas.

I would love there to be a daily show of Catholic news from a panel of people along with guests.  Something in the 30 to 40 minute range.  Providing a Catholic view of what’s going on helps to give listeners a solid perspective.  In fact there should be multiple shows of this type that could focus on stories of international and national interest for Catholics.  Of course the time and money involved requires a lot of effort and Catholics as a whole really don’t support these efforts. On the other side, tech podcasts networks such as TWIT and 5by5 are making money and paying the people involved in the shows.  Leo Laporte’s TWIT network was able to even build a studio providing high quality video and audio productions.  Catholic media is always seemingly in a constant state of survival.  Pledge drives are very common or requests from EWTN to send donations.

As I noted the other day while there are some very good Catholic shows, there really should be so many more of them.  There are many more Apple related podcasts for example than Catholic podcasts.

I think it is rather embarrassing that geeks seem to support such endeavors much more than Catholics as a whole do. I like playing around with gadgets and staying abreast with the world of technology, but my faith is so much more awesome.  The treasury of the Catholic faith is so immense that in our lives we can but put a dent into it. What is more wonderful than Jesus or savior and the Church he gave us? I guess the answer is gadgets and other shiny things.

December 17, 2012December 17, 2012 16 comments
0 FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
Book Review

Christianity, Islam and Atheism

by Jeffrey Miller December 16, 2012
written by Jeffrey Miller

Christianity, Islam and Atheism: The Struggle for The Soul of The West is a new book from Ignatius Press by William Kilpatrick. This is not a light read, but I found it to be an very informative read.

There are a range of ideas about engaging Islam and whether Islamist terrorists are misusing their religion or are more faithful adherents of it.  Within Catholic circles to some extent these differing views are represented  by Robert Spenser and Peter Kreeft.  In fact these two men engaged in a debate on the subject that I thought was a great debate in both the issues and how both men respected the other.

I tend to fall in the Robert Spenser end of the spectrum and so did this book.  There is certainly a Mark Steyn like approach in this book and Mark Steyn is quoted rather extensively in it.  The Mark Steyn view is displayed regarding demographics and how emigration of Muslims into Europe is affecting these countries.  Especially as there has been less integration into these cultures as is usual. But this goes beyond the normal political approach and into subjects relating to the Church and the Evangelization of Muslims.

The book is misnamed to some extent where atheism is really a reference to secularism and a reaction to Islam that is represented  by some agnostics, atheists, and believers of a more liberal stripe.  The second section of the book on “Islam’s Enablers” is a reference to this and how bad behavior by some Muslims are protected and covered up. The book contains multiple examples of how tolerant societies have allowed this behavior while evicting or punishing to some extent those who highlight and fight agains this. In many ways it is quite laudable when people want to prevent prejudice of one group because of the actions of a segment of that group. The problem comes in when serious problems are smoothed over and no engagement comes to label and resist these problems.  Multiculturalism is really not practiced, what we actually have is favored-culturalism and the diminishment of other cultures.  For example the book demonstrates how textbooks have come to favor Islam while demeaning Christianity.

I found the third section to be the most interesting “The Comparison.”  We often hear of the approach towards Muslims as being one of the Abrahamic religions and that there are commonalities we can build upon.  William Kilpatrick demonstrates quite well that these common foundations are either non-existent or quiet weak.  For example Jesus in the Koran is purely of sock puppet for Mohammed to deny that Jesus was the son of God.  The Koranic Jesus plays a very minor role. A Jesus who performed no miracles and was not crucified – the very Jesus you would expect if you wanted to supplant him.  The Koranic Abraham is also much difference and the different view is more likely to cause contention than to unite.  This pretty much is true of most of the comparisons that are suppose to provide a common foundation. Although this is really to be expected in comparisons of Abrahamic religions in that Islam is a heresy cobbled up from Christianity and other sources with no historical foundation to the claims that are made.  The standards of historical reliability somehow never seem to get applied to the Koran and we will not be seeing “The Real Mohammed” on the History Channel any time soon.  Still it is important to remember that however fabricated Islam is that there is always commonality with Muslims themselves.

The last section “The Cold War with Islam” expresses an idea I had not really considered before with a comparison to the cold war with Communism.  While not a perfect parallel there is much to think about here.  Things don’t have to end up in a shooting war to be addressed.  He goes over several approaches and critiques ideas such as the moderate-Mulsim strategy. A chapter in this section deals with what Christians should do. Obviously this requires a multifaceted approach  with of course Evangelization being the priority.  Too often we walk on eggshells in relating to Islam. One of the facinating things I learned about was a Coptic priest Fr. Zakaria Botros. I don’t think I had ever heard of him, but he is well versed on Islamic teachings and has a television show.  His show challenging Islam has resulted in al-Qaeda putting a $60 million bounty on his head.  He is suppose to be rather effective resulting in conversions.  Many Muslims are not use to being engaged at this level, but considering the various punishment for apostasy this is a very difficult area. Another book by Ignatius Press The Price To Pay: A Muslim Risks All to Follow Christ tells the story of a Muslim convert who was shot and left for dead by his brothers because of his conversion.  There is certainly not just one approach and the Catholic both/and applies.  There is and should be common cause with Muslims where possible and the message of the Gospel should not be left out.

Over all I found this well-worth reading and I learned a lot while also giving me much to think about.

December 16, 2012 2 comments
0 FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
The Weekly Benedict

The Weekly Benedict eBook – Volume 42

by Jeffrey Miller December 16, 2012
written by Jeffrey Miller

Weekly Benedict

This is the 42nd volume of The Weekly Benedict ebook which is a compilation of the Holy Father’s writings, speeches, etc which I post at Jimmy Akin’s The Weekly Benedict. The post at Jimmy Akin’s site contains a link to each document on the Vatican’s site and does not require an e-reader to use.

This volume covers material released during the last week for 3 December, 2012 – 12 December 2012.

The ebook contains a table of contents and the material is arranged in sections such as Angelus, Speeches, etc in date order. The full index is listed on Jimmy’s site.

The Weekly Benedict – Volume 42 – ePub (supports most readers)

The Weekly Benedict – Volume 42 – Kindle

There is an archive for all of The Weekly Benedict eBook volumes.  This page is available via the header of this blog or from here.

December 16, 2012 0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
HumorLiturgy

Liturgical Referees

by Jeffrey Miller December 15, 2012
written by Jeffrey Miller

I was asked to repost this which I did back in 2007.

 

Have you ever been a Sunday morning quarterback during Mass where you critique and liturgical abuses or experimental oddities that you have observed. You just wish at times that somebody would step in and do something about what your are observing.Well we have some good news for you! Francis Cardinal Arinze the Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments has introduced a new program that will surely have an effect.

The recently created position of Liturgical Referee has been instituted to help to bring uniformity to the celebration of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. Liturgical Referees will travel around the world randomly attending Masses. Liturgical Referees will stand, mostly quietly, to the side of the sanctuary during Mass and call out signals if he observes any liturgical penalties according to the GIRM and other liturgical documents. Only in the case of penalties that would make the Mass itself invalid will the Liturgical Referee blow his whistle and when necessary call for any replays to correct any mistake made. Penalty markers may be thrown during the Mass to alert the celebrant to any problems that might need immediate correction.


Liturgical Referee in action

After Mass any penalties will be reviewed with the celebrant and more serious penalties will be taken to the local ordinary for determination for any fines or whether the celebrant just needs to get back to the liturgical playbook (GIRM) and/or to review films of properly celebrated Masses. In the case of penalty free liturgies the Liturgical Referee will thank the celebrant and be given the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments seal of approval.

The Liturgical Referee’s has responsibility in enforcing the liturgical rules and maintaining the order of the liturgy. During the liturgy please do not yell out or insult the Liturgical Referee. We assure you he is not blind and is doing his job to the best of his abilities and whether you feel he has missed a liturgical abuse or that he is being too hard on your pastor we ask that you act charitably on his calls.

Applicants for Liturgical Referee should be well versed in Canon Law as applies to the liturgy, the GIRM and other liturgical documents, and a familiarity with any indults and permissions as set by the local bishop’s conference and the local ordinary. The applicant should also be physically fit so that he will be able to make all off the signals that might be required at a more experimental celebration of the liturgy. Applicants should be familiar with the following liturgical signals.

Example Liturgical Signals
No Crucifix in sanctuary.
Liturgical dance detected.
Member of laity giving homily – to be evicted from lectern.
Incomplete or no consecration. Occurs when illicit matter is used, wrong formula used, only one of the two elements of bread or wine is not properly consecrated, or no validly ordained male priest/bishop is present. In case where only one element is consecrated a replay is called for.
Illegal use of hands. Normally called when the celebrant has left the sanctuary to shake everybody’s hands.
Questionable or just downright heretical theology used in homily. When detected the Liturgical Ref pulls on his lips in a downward direction.
The “What the heck am my hearing” signal is one of the most common signals and indicates syrupy banal liturgical music or the inappropriate use of secular music such as show tunes and popular music (especially from the seventies).
Disregarding the prescribed text of the Order of Mass. This is another common liturgical penalty despite the fact that no other person, even if he be a priest, may add, remove, or change anything in the liturgy on his own authority. (Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy)
Illicit Posture. Usually called when you are being asked to stand instead of kneel or any other poster adaptation not specified by the GIRM or set by your bishop’s conference or licitly specified by your local ordinary.
Illicit purification of sacred vessels. This is called when the purification of the sacred vessels is done by an Extraordinary Minister of Holy Communion despite the fact the the Pope revoked the indult in the U.S. for this permission.
Illicit Participation. Called when too many people are in the sanctuary. For example occurs when EMHC arrive before the fraction rite or when some members of the congregation are invited into the sanctuary to pray with the priest during the consecration.
Un-Christian Like Conduct. Can be called when elements of other religions contrary to Christianity are introduced such as new age beliefs. Un-Christian Like Conduct is also often called in the parking lot after Mass.
Illegal Pass. The celebrant is simply not allowed to make a pass at anybody.
Stole Infraction. Normally occurs when the celebrant wears his stole on top of the chasuble. Another penalty can be added if the celebrant does this and the stole is also horrendously ugly or has an seventies themes.
Illegal Receiver of Holy Communion. Those who are excommunicated or interdicted after the imposition or declaration of the penalty and others who obstinately persist in manifest grave sin are not to be admitted to Holy Communion.
Clowns in the sanctuary – run for your life.
Excessive use of inclusive language. Penalty is thrown when grammatical awkwardness is detected in avoiding male pronouns and every other sentence begins brothers and sisters.

With the presence of the Liturgical Referee you can leave liturgical abuse spotting to the experts and spend your time instead trying to enter the Mass in prayer.

Update: Fr. Philip N. Powell, OP has some other liturgical hand signals not included in the examples above.

Update 2: Some have asked for a version of this they can easily print out. I have created a PDF version of this parody.

December 15, 2012 9 comments
0 FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
Punditry

Theist bait

by Jeffrey Miller December 13, 2012
written by Jeffrey Miller

I started seeing noise on Twitter about an atheist billboard in Times Square.

David Silverman, President of American Atheists stated, “We know that a large population of ‘Christians’ are actually atheists who feel trapped in their family’s religion. If you know god is a myth, you do not have to lie and call yourself ‘Christian’ in order to have a festive holiday season. You can be merry without the myth, and indeed, you should.”

Mr. Silverman continued, “We encourage people to be honest with themselves and their families this year. If you don’t believe in god, tell your family—honesty is the greatest gift, and they deserve it.”

Teresa MacBain, Communications Director and a former pastor stated, “The true beauty of the season—family, friends, and love—have nothing to do with the gods of yesteryear. Indeed, the season is far more enjoyable without the religious baggage of guilt and judgmentalism. Dump the myth and have a happy holiday season.”

So isn't an atheist billboard in Times Square kind of preaching to the choir?

— ➡️Curt Jester⬅️ (@CurtJester) December 13, 2012

“Dump the myth and have a happy holiday season.” Been there done that. Would much rather enjoy the gift of faith and ponder upon the wonders of the Incarnation. I was certainly happy as an atheist, but prefer both happiness and joy.

Billboards like this are theist bait designed to get attention and so this is effective at some level. I do wonder if there really are the masses of people hiding their non-belief? Seems to me that there is now more stigma associated with faith than in agnosticism and atheism. The fundamentalist and the bible thumper has plenty of stereotype attention. While I am sure there are some people who do hide their unbelief. Are they really just waiting for a billboard in Time Square for encouragement to come out? Plus as others have noted there is the odd irony of promoting Santa while saying Jesus is a myth. Maybe campaigns like this are to create a sense of community for atheists. We all seek a sense of community and desire encouragement for the like-minded.

As The Crescat noted Atheists.org, be honest. It’s just Christians you have issue with, not religion in general…. This fact has certainly been noted before that it is almost always Christianity that is aimed at and ridiculed. It would seem that atheism should be an equal opportunity ridiculer of religion. Still it makes sense that this is so in a Christian/post-Christian society and that this would be the target.

The more interesting question is why such campaigns and efforts by atheists are more like political campaigns and attack ad based. Where are the signs/bumper stickers/reaching out efforts promoting the positive joy of atheism. For a group that constantly talks about reason the efforts are largely mockery-based. If you had a positive atheist message on a bumper sticker what would it be? Even in the realm of car magnets atheists mock the Ichtus instead of advancing their own symbol.

When I tweeted something along these lines earlier I got a bunch of joyful replies from atheists on the positive aspects of unbelief. I mean by joyful use of the F-word and assumptions made not based on what I wrote. Apparently the thing to be avoided at all costs is guilt. The sign of a working conscience is now a defect. I found a rather odd way to avoid guilt, I try to avoid sin – fancy that.

December 13, 2012 11 comments
0 FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
Newer Posts
Older Posts

About Me

Jeff Miller is a former atheist who after spending forty years in the wilderness finds himself with both astonishment and joy a member of the Catholic Church. This award-winning blog presents my hopefully humorous and sometimes serious take on things religious, political, and whatever else crosses my mind.

Conversion story

  • Catholic Answers Magazine
  • Coming Home Network

Appearances on:

  • The Journey Home
  • Hands On Apologetics (YouTube)
  • Catholic RE.CON.

Blogging since July 2002

Recent Posts

  • The Weekly Leo

  • A Litany of Gratitude

  • The Spiritual Life and Memes

  • What is your distance from Jesus on the Cross?

  • Feast of St. Thomas, Apostle

  • Gratitude and Generosity

  • “The Heart and Center of Catholicism”

  • Post-Lent Report

  • Stay in your lane

  • Echoing through creation

  • Another Heaven

  • My Year in Books – 2024 Edition

  • I Have a Confession to Make

  • A Mandatory Take

  • Everybody is ignorant

  • Sacramental Disposal, LLC

  • TL;DH (Too Long;Didn’t Hear)

  • A Shop Mark Would Like

  • The Narrow Way Through the Sacred Heart of Jesus

  • Time Travel and Fixing Up Our Past

  • The Weekly Leo

  • The Weekly Leo

  • The Weekly Leo

Meta

I also blog at Happy Catholic Bookshelf Entries RSS
Entries ATOM
Comments RSS
Email: curtjester@gmail.com

What I'm currently reading

Subscribe to The Curt Jester by Email

Endorsements

  • The Curt Jester: Disturbingly Funny --Mark Shea
  • EX-cellent blog --Jimmy Akin
  • One wag has even posted a list of the Top Ten signs that someone is in the grip of "motu-mania," -- John Allen Jr.
  • Brilliance abounds --Victor Lams
  • The Curt Jester is a blog of wise-ass musings on the media, politics, and things "Papist." The Revealer

Archives

About Me

Jeff Miller is a former atheist who after spending forty years in the wilderness finds himself with both astonishment and joy a member of the Catholic Church. This award winning blog presents my hopefully humorous and sometimes serious take on things religious, political, and whatever else crosses my mind.
My conversion story
  • The Curt Jester: Disturbingly Funny --Mark Shea
  • EX-cellent blog --Jimmy Akin
  • One wag has even posted a list of the Top Ten signs that someone is in the grip of "motu-mania," -- John Allen Jr.
  • Brilliance abounds --Victor Lams
  • The Curt Jester is a blog of wise-ass musings on the media, politics, and things "Papist." The Revealer

Meta

I also blog at Happy Catholic Bookshelf Twitter
Facebook
Entries RSS
Entries ATOM
Comments RSS 2.0" >RSS
Email: curtjester@gmail.com

What I'm currently reading

Subscribe to The Curt Jester by Email

Commercial Interuption

Podcasts

•Catholic Answers Live Subscribe to Podcast RSS
•Catholic Underground Subscribe to Podcast RSS
•Catholic Vitamins Subscribe to Podcast RSS
•EWTN (Multiple Podcasts) Subscribe to Podcast RSS
•Forgotten Classics Subscribe to Podcast RSS
•Kresta in the Afternoon Subscribe to Podcast RSS
•SQPN - Tons of great Catholic podcasts Subscribe to Podcast RSS
•The Catholic Hack Subscribe to Podcast RSS
•The Catholic Laboratory Subscribe to Podcast RSS
•The Catholics Next Door Subscribe to Podcast RSS
•What does the prayer really say? Subscribe to Podcast RSS

Archives

Catholic Sites

  • Big Pulpit
  • Capuchin Friars
  • Catholic Answers
  • Catholic Lane
  • Crisis Magazine
  • New Evangelizers
  • Waking Up Catholic

Ministerial Bloghood

  • A Jesuit’s Journey
  • A Shepherd’s Voice
  • Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam
  • Adam’s Ale
  • Archbishop Dolan
  • Bonfire of the Vanities
  • Cardinal Sean’s Blog
  • Da Mihi Animas
  • Domine, da mihi hanc aquam!
  • Father Joe
  • Fr. Roderick
  • Godzdogz
  • Laus Crucis
  • Omne Quod Spirat, Laudet Dominum
  • Orthometer
  • Priests for Life
  • Servant and Steward
  • Standing on My Head
  • The hermeneutic of continuity
  • This Week at Vatican II
  • Waiting in Joyful Hope
  • What Does The Prayer Really Say?

Bloghood of the Faithful

  • A Catholic Mom Climbing the Pillars
  • A Catholic Mom in Hawaii
  • A Long Island Catholic
  • A Wing And A Prayer
  • Acts of the Apostasy
  • Ad Altare Dei
  • AdoroTeDevote
  • Against the Grain
  • Aggie Catholics
  • Aliens in this world
  • Always Catholic
  • American Chesterton Society
  • American Papist
  • Among Women
  • And Sometimes Tea
  • Ask Sister Mary Martha
  • auntie joanna writes
  • Bad Catholic
  • Bethune Catholic
  • Big C Catholics
  • Bl. Thaddeus McCarthy's Catholic Heritage Association
  • Catholic and Enjoying It!
  • Catholic Answers Blog
  • Catholic Fire
  • Catholic New Media Roundup
  • Charlotte was Both
  • Christus Vincit
  • Confessions of a Hot Carmel Sundae
  • Cor ad cor loquitur
  • Courageous Priest
  • Creative Minority Report
  • CVSTOS FIDEI
  • Dads Called to Holiness
  • Darwin Catholic
  • Defend us in Battle
  • Defenders of the Catholic Faith
  • Disputations
  • Divine Life
  • Domenico Bettinelli Jr.
  • Dominican Idaho
  • Dyspectic Mutterings
  • Ecce Homo
  • Ecclesia Militans
  • Eve Tushnet
  • Eye of the Tiber
  • feminine-genius
  • Five Feet of Fury
  • Flying Stars
  • For The Greater Glory
  • Get Religion
  • GKC’s Favourite
  • God’s Wonderful Love
  • Gray Matters
  • Happy Catholic
  • Ignatius Insight Scoop
  • In Dwelling
  • In the Light of the Law
  • InForum Blog
  • Jeff Cavins
  • Jimmy Akin
  • John C. Wright
  • La Salette Journey
  • Laudem Gloriae
  • Lex Communis
  • Life is a Prayer
  • Man with Black Hat
  • Maria Lectrix
  • Mary Meets Dolly
  • MONIALES OP
  • Mulier Fortis
  • Musings of a Pertinacious Papist
  • My Domestic Church
  • Nunblog
  • Oblique House
  • Open wide the doors to Christ!
  • Over the Rhine and Into the Tiber
  • Patrick Madrid
  • Pro Ecclesia * Pro Familia * Pro Civitate
  • Recta Ratio
  • Saint Mary Magdalen
  • Sonitus Sanctus
  • Southern-Fried Catholicism
  • St. Conleth's Catholic Heritage Association
  • Stony Creek Digest
  • Testosterhome
  • The Ark and the Dove
  • The B-Movie Catechism
  • The Crescat
  • The Daily Eudemon
  • The Digital Hairshirt
  • The Four Pillars
  • The Inn at the End of the World
  • The Ironic Catholic
  • The Lady in the Pew
  • The Lion and the Cardinal
  • The New Liturgical Movement
  • The Pulp.it
  • The Sacred Page
  • The Sci Fi Catholic
  • The Scratching Post
  • The Weight of Glory
  • The Wired Catholic
  • Two Catholic Men and a Blog
  • Unam Sanctam Catholicam
  • Video meliora, proboque; Deteriora sequor
  • Vivificat
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • RSS

@2025 - www.splendoroftruth.com/curtjester. All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by PenciDesign


Back To Top