{"id":8323,"date":"2003-05-13T19:04:51","date_gmt":"2003-05-14T00:04:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:8888\/2003\/05\/13\/the-american-military\/"},"modified":"2003-05-13T19:04:51","modified_gmt":"2003-05-14T00:04:51","slug":"the-american-military","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.splendoroftruth.com\/curtjester\/2003\/05\/the-american-military\/","title":{"rendered":"The American Military"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"articles\">WHILE IT is understandable that President George W. Bush and<br \/>\nhis secretary of defense are receiving plaudits for the relatively swift military<br \/>\nvictory in Iraq, the fact of the matter is that most of the credit for the<br \/>\nsuccessful military operation should go to the Clinton administration. <\/p>\n<p class=\"articles\">As Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld noted, the battle plan that led to<br \/>\nthe American success was that of General Tommy Franks, an Army officer appointed<br \/>\nto head the Central Command by the Clinton administration. More important,<br \/>\nthe military forces that executed that plan so boldly and bravely were for<br \/>\nthe most part recruited, trained, and equipped by the Clinton administration. <\/p>\n<p class=\"articles\">The first Bush defense budget went into effect on Oct. 1, 2002, and none of<br \/>\nthe funds in that budget have yet had an impact on the quality of the men and<br \/>\nwomen in the armed services, their readiness for combat, or the weapons they<br \/>\nused to obliterate the Iraqi forces. <\/p>\n<p><span class=\"articles\">Given the way that Bush and his surrogates disparaged Clinton&#8217;s approach to<br \/>\nthe military in his 2000 campaign, this is ironic. The president and his advisers<br \/>\nclaimed that Clinton had diminished the armed forces&#8217; fighting edge by turning<br \/>\nthem into social workers and sending them too often on &#8221;useless&#8221; nation-building<br \/>\nexercises. These same people also claimed that Clinton had so underfunded the<br \/>\nmilitary that it was in a condition similar to that which existed on the eve<br \/>\nof Pearl Harbor. <br \/>\n[<a href=\"http:\/\/boston.com\/dailyglobe2\/133\/editorials\/Thank_Clinton_for_a_speedy_victory_in_IraqP.shtml\">Full<br \/>\nStory<\/a>]<br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"post\">Speaking as someone who served under Clinton for six years in<br \/>\nthe Navy until I retired, I would say that the military succeeded in spite<br \/>\nof the Clinton years. We had planes<br \/>\nthat were not mission capable because we didn&#8217;t have money for parts or pilots<br \/>\ncouldn&#8217;t get their flight hours in because of lack of funding for AVGAS while<br \/>\ntop ranking civilians in the Pentagon went out spending thousands of dollars<br \/>\non meals. Because the number of ships had been so drastically reduced we were<br \/>\ngoing on more deployments and spending less and less time with our families.  <\/p>\n<p class=\"post\">During the declining years of Bush-41 years they were looking<br \/>\nfor the peace dividend as the result of the victory in the cold war, so the<br \/>\ntrend started<br \/>\nthere but it greatly increased during the Clinton years. I don&#8217;t remember<br \/>\none military program or weapons system that Clinton spearheaded to put through,<br \/>\nI don&#8217;t remember one speech encouraging the congress to fully support the military<br \/>\nin funding. Many of the people put in charge in the civilian side of the military<br \/>\nhad no direct military experience and their policies showed it.<\/p>\n<p class=\"post\">I also experienced<br \/>\nthe social engineering that went on and the silliness of paperwork that we<br \/>\nhad<br \/>\nto fill out. I actually had to sign a page 13 in my service record specifying<br \/>\nthat I would obey the two man rule when going out on liberty. I was on the<br \/>\nfirst carrier outfitted to go to sea with a mixed crew. We were not allowed<br \/>\nto mention problems. We were not to talk to reporters about this implementation.<br \/>\nThere were so many women being taken off the ship and flown back because they<br \/>\nwere pregnant that our ship became a joke in the Norfolk papers. I remember<br \/>\nseeing one editorial cartoon where there was a stork flying over the flight<br \/>\ndeck and the radioman says &quot;Captain, the stork is asking permission to land.&quot;<br \/>\nThey even started to strip the urinals out of heads on carriers in the name<br \/>\nof gender equality. There were also two physical standards, one for men and<br \/>\none for women when in came to physical readiness testing, yet in a emergency<br \/>\nyou would<br \/>\nrequire every crewman to be able to lug out a P-250 dewatering pump or to carry<br \/>\na shipmate up a vertical ladder if they were injured. But politically these<br \/>\ntopics<br \/>\nwere<br \/>\nuntouchable and there was no one we could complain to, the party line was be<br \/>\nquiet and bear it.<\/p>\n<p class=\"post\">And why is it that the people who claim the military as Clinton&#8217;s<br \/>\ndon&#8217;t also claim the FBI and CIA that blew so many chances in possibly preventing<br \/>\n9-11, but I guess I just answered my own question.  I also think that President<br \/>\nBush should have fired both of these directors, especially George Tenant. In<br \/>\nmany ways the caliber of the people in the military does not rely on what political<br \/>\nparty is currently in charge. I served under Presidents Carter, Reagan, Bush<br \/>\nand Clinton and even with the vast differences in Presidents, it did not affect<br \/>\nthe positive can-do attitude<br \/>\nof the people in the military. But the people in those leadership positions<br \/>\ndoes greatly affect the support given them.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>WHILE IT is understandable that President George W. Bush and his secretary of defense are receiving plaudits for the relatively swift military victory in Iraq, the fact of the matter&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8323","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-other"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.splendoroftruth.com\/curtjester\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8323","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.splendoroftruth.com\/curtjester\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.splendoroftruth.com\/curtjester\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.splendoroftruth.com\/curtjester\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.splendoroftruth.com\/curtjester\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8323"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.splendoroftruth.com\/curtjester\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8323\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.splendoroftruth.com\/curtjester\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8323"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.splendoroftruth.com\/curtjester\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8323"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.splendoroftruth.com\/curtjester\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8323"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}