{"id":12718,"date":"2012-06-27T19:16:25","date_gmt":"2012-06-27T23:16:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.splendoroftruth.com\/curtjester\/?p=12718"},"modified":"2012-06-27T19:16:25","modified_gmt":"2012-06-27T23:16:25","slug":"bad-religion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.splendoroftruth.com\/curtjester\/2012\/06\/bad-religion\/","title":{"rendered":"Bad Religion"},"content":{"rendered":"

I had noticed that TS of\u00a0Video, meliora, proboque; Deteriora sequor<\/a>\u00a0had been reading through\u00a0Bad Religion: How We Became a Nation of Heretics<\/a>\"\"\u00a0by Ross Douthat and quoting passages from it. \u00a0The title and subtitle intrigued me as does the author and so I added it to my wish list and finally got around to buying and reading it.<\/p>\n

This book is sort of a history and critique of Christianity as practiced by Americans especially in the last seventy or so years. \u00a0His critique is that we are a nation of heretics and that really we have always been a nation of heretics from the foundation of the country. \u00a0What has changed is the amount of orthodoxy as practiced by the various strains of American Christianity. \u00a0His use of the word heretics is the more general term of use and not a precise canonical one.<\/p>\n

As a critique the history provided is of \u00a0the major trends and personalities involved along with snapshots of data to help you put it all into context. \u00a0We see how these religious trends often intersected with societal ones and how more and more they took on political tones. \u00a0These movements within Christianity as practiced in America paralleled movements of thought from Europe resulting in very American formulations of it along with negative reactions to this. \u00a0He breaks up these movements into two basic areas of accommodation and resistance and reviews both the Protestant and Catholic sides of it. \u00a0Accommodation being the various forms predominate in a more liberal Christianity along with resistance like the neo-Orthodox movement. This makes up the first half of the book and provides a very readable summary of this history along with exploring the philosophies and personalities behind it.<\/p>\n

The second half of the book looks at \u00a0the various heresies that are predominant now. \u00a0The culture and the media\u2019s fascination with some of the so-called lost gospels and other gnostic writings used to beat Christianity shows the old adage about \u201cany stick will do.\u201d \u00a0From the inept translation of the Gospel of Judas as headed by the National Geographic to so much nonsense that has made it to the History Channel we see how that stick is used. \u00a0They will call the Catholic Church anti-women while promoting the \u201cGospel\u201d of Thomas where you have to become a man to go to Heaven.<\/p>\n

He also explores those who promote a materialistic \u00a0prosperity gospel of \u201cName it and claim it\u201d the Word of Faith movement. \u00a0I find it no surprise that this movement developed in the U.S. and also not a surprise that it runs parallels to the New Age teaching of the \u201cthe law of attraction\u201d as espoused in so many books Oprah promoted. Strains of Dr. Norman Vincent Peale \u201cThe Power of Positive Thinking\u201d have taken some strange paths.<\/p>\n

New Age emphasis on the \u201cGod within\u201d has also made many inroads and entries into not only the popular culture, but also the retreat house. It is almost despairing when books like Elizabeth Gilbert\u2019s \u201cEat, Pray. Love\u201d which exhibit a toxic selfishness not only becomes a best seller, but a movie also. But when the god is within you than sin is dispelled and whatever you happen to be doing is of course part of the will of the god within for you. Mystical pantheism dressed up in radical selfishness.<\/p>\n

I found especially interesting the last chapter \u201cThe City on the Hill\u201d which looks in part at the various religious\/political intersections and how they have played out in our history. The alternations between messianic and apocalyptic views which more and more are existing in parallel. These intersections were to the good in the Civil Rights movements where we had both sides of the political divide along with the parallel elements in various churches. Ross Douthat analysis of this success of this only highlights the failure of modern religious and political partisanship. This is certainly not a simple \u201cliberal bad, conservatives good\u201d book as I think he gives a fair analysis regarding both sides. I certainly did not agree with all of his analysis, but when I didn\u2019t I was more apt to look at my own ideas and see if perhaps I was mistaken or needed to reevaluate something. The conclusion of the book reflects both his \u201cspirit of pessimism\u201d and a hopeful optimism.<\/p>\n

This book has been written in a spirit of pessimism, but for both Americans and Christians, pessimism should always be provisional. Even in an era of disarray, Americans can draw confidence from our nation\u2019s remarkable past, with its stories of expectations confounded, obstacles overcome, declines reversed, and better futures attained. Christians have an even stronger source of confidence: the belief that history has an Author and that the destiny of both their country and their creed is in God\u2019s hands.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Ross Douthat as a Catholic knows that the promise concerning the Church\u2019s protection from the Gates of Hell does not mean a protection of American Christianity as he points out. He does not pretend to predict how this ebbs and flows of Christianity within the context of the United States will play out, but he also knows that there have been many predicted ends for it.<\/p>\n

As a writer Ross Douthat is really a joy to read and I especially liked the precision in what he wrote. Some people will use their large vocabulary as a spotlight to show how bright they are. I don\u2019t think that was the case here, but I am glad I read the ebook version where a dictionary definition was only a finger press away. When he did use unfamiliar words I found they were perfected fitted to what he was saying.<\/p>\n