{"id":3463,"date":"2007-11-21T13:41:19","date_gmt":"2007-11-21T18:41:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:8888\/2007\/11\/21\/bishops-book-of-the-month\/"},"modified":"2007-11-21T13:41:19","modified_gmt":"2007-11-21T18:41:19","slug":"bishops-book-of-the-month","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.splendoroftruth.com\/curtjester\/2007\/11\/bishops-book-of-the-month\/","title":{"rendered":"Bishop&#039;s book of the month"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"blog\">\nLast week there was a humorous exchange at the Bishop&#8217;s meeting over<br \/>\nan apparent typo in the draft of Faithful Citizenship where it said<br \/>\n&#8220;end<br \/>\nmarriage&#8221; instead of &#8220;defend marriage.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Though sometimes you have wonder. &nbsp;Last week Leon Suprenant <a\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.cufblog.org\/?p=162\" target=\"_blank\">posted<br \/>\nabout the use of a book<\/a> by a dissident theologian being<br \/>\nrecommended by the USCCB&#8217;s marriage&nbsp;website at<br \/>\nwww.foryourmarriage.com. &nbsp; A Daring Promise: A Spirituality of<br \/>\nMarriage By Richard R. Gaillardetz is promoted <a\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.foryourmarriage.org\/interior_template.asp?id=20398733\">as<br \/>\nthe book of the month<\/a>. Gaillardetz is your typical dissident<br \/>\ntheologian and Charles Curran admirer who apparently supports<br \/>\nhomosexual<br \/>\nacts, women&#8217;s ordination, &nbsp;has a quite flawed view of the<br \/>\nstructure of the early Church and a narrow view on papal infallibility<br \/>\nand the magisterium (though an expansive one on the sensus fidelium).<\/p>\n<p>The book that is recommended is reviewed on the bishop&#8217;s site and says.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article\">Several points may disturb some<br \/>\nreaders.&nbsp; draws upon Pope<br \/>\nJohn Paul II&#8217;s theology of the body yet offers gentle criticism. After<br \/>\nadmonishing couples to embrace church teaching on family planning<br \/>\nthrough sound understanding and surrender to the rigorous demands of<br \/>\nChristianity, he notes that a couple who still &#8220;cannot discover in<br \/>\n(magisterial teaching) God&#8217;s will&#8221; can follow their consciences. While<br \/>\nhe says most &#8220;domestic churches&#8221; are constituted by marriage and<br \/>\ninclude children, he includes under that term other households.<\/p>\n<p class=\"blog\">Gee how could basically saying that if you<br \/>\ndon&#8217;t want to follow the Church&#8217;s teaching on the grave sin of<br \/>\ncontraception you just follow your badly formed conscience&nbsp; be<br \/>\nsomething to &#8220;disturb some readers?&#8221; &nbsp;Well I guess if you just<br \/>\nhappen to be faithful to Church teaching and truth. &nbsp; Forget<br \/>\nabout those &#8220;rigorous demands of Christianity&#8221; and for example &#8220;picking<br \/>\nup your cross daily.&#8221; &nbsp;If only Gaillardetz had been there for<br \/>\nOnan to explain to God how Onan&#8217;s was just following his conscience.<\/p>\n<p class=\"blog\">One Amazon reviewer noted about this book<br \/>\n&#8220;He comments on how he ran into a former classmate who was brilliant in<br \/>\ncollege and now she was married with kids and he couldn&#8217;t help but feel<br \/>\nsorry that she &#8220;sold out&#8221; and stopped using her God given mind.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p class=\"blog\">The comment section of the original post<br \/>\nhas some detailed critiques of the writings of <a\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.cufblog.org\/?p=162\" target=\"_blank\">Richard<br \/>\nR. Gaillardetz<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"blog\">In a <a\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.cufblog.org\/?p=179\" target=\"_blank\">new<br \/>\npost by Leon Suprenant<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article\">Regarding our recent post on the U.S.<br \/>\nBishops\ufffd new \ufffdFor Your Marriage\ufffd website, we received the following<br \/>\ncomment from marriage and family expert John F. Kippley regarding the<br \/>\nsite\ufffds recommendation of the work of Dr. Richard Gaillardetz:<\/p>\n<p>\ufffdThanks for directing me to the long analysis of the works of the<br \/>\ndissenting theologian,&nbsp; Dr. Richard Gaillardetz.&nbsp; It<br \/>\nappears that what he is doing is simply a repeat of what Fr. Curran and<br \/>\nothers did in the Sixties . . . I thought the bishops were beyond that<br \/>\nstuff. . . . It is just crazy that the bishops would even mention works<br \/>\nby someone like Gaillardetz. . . .\ufffd <\/p>\n<p>Another reader contacted the USCCB about the problematic site and<br \/>\nreceived this response:<\/p>\n<p>\ufffdDr. Gaillardetz is a well-known and respected Catholic theologian who<br \/>\nholds the chair in Catholic Studies at the University of Toledo. He has<br \/>\nbeen a guest presenter at a meeting of the Bishops\ufffd Committee on<br \/>\nMarriage and Family. I don\ufffdt know if you\ufffdve read \ufffdA Daring Promise,\ufffd<br \/>\nbut it presents a realistic\ufffdand hopeful\ufffdvision of married life in a way<br \/>\nthat is accessible to average Catholics. It is an important book in its<br \/>\nfield. I think our reviewer did justice to the book by identifying its<br \/>\nstrengths as well as noting what might be disturbing.\ufffd<\/p>\n<p>Despite this disappointing response, we have good reason to believe<br \/>\nthat the shortcomings of the site are being addressed at this time, and<br \/>\nwe\ufffdll keep our readers posted regarding further developments.<\/p>\n<p class=\"blog\">I hope he is right, but I am not exactly<br \/>\nencouraged by the response. &nbsp;When you say dissenting from the<br \/>\nmagisterium &#8220;might be disturbing&#8221; instead of saying that it is flat out wrong you are not exactly making your case.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Last week there was a humorous exchange at the Bishop&#8217;s meeting over an apparent typo in the draft of Faithful Citizenship where it said &#8220;end marriage&#8221; instead of &#8220;defend marriage.&#8221;&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[24],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3463","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-punditry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.splendoroftruth.com\/curtjester\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3463","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.splendoroftruth.com\/curtjester\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.splendoroftruth.com\/curtjester\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.splendoroftruth.com\/curtjester\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.splendoroftruth.com\/curtjester\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3463"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.splendoroftruth.com\/curtjester\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3463\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.splendoroftruth.com\/curtjester\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3463"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.splendoroftruth.com\/curtjester\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3463"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.splendoroftruth.com\/curtjester\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3463"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}