{"id":2225,"date":"2009-06-15T17:30:22","date_gmt":"2009-06-15T22:30:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:8888\/2009\/06\/15\/sotomayor-will-not-become-soutermayor\/"},"modified":"2009-06-15T17:30:22","modified_gmt":"2009-06-15T22:30:22","slug":"sotomayor-will-not-become-soutermayor","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.splendoroftruth.com\/curtjester\/2009\/06\/sotomayor-will-not-become-soutermayor\/","title":{"rendered":"Sotomayor will not become Soutermayor"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"article\">A Washington Times editorial on Wednesday unveiled further evidence of Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor&#8217;s support for unlimited abortion rights. The paper revealed the contents of four more amicus curiae briefs authored under Sotomayor, urging the Supreme Court not to &#8220;overturn or in any way restrict&#8221; Roe v. Wade.<\/p>\n<p>The first such brief from the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund (PRLDEF), where Sotomayor served as a board member between 1980 and 1992, was unearthed in late May and addressed the 1989 Supreme Court case Webster v. Reproductive Health Cases.<\/p>\n<p>The brief, signed by several interest groups, stated: &#8220;All Amici share an urgent concern that the Court clearly and unequivocally reaffirm Roe v. Wade. &#8230; They fear that any tampering with the right to abortion recognized in Roe will have a powerful, adverse impact on the liberty, equality and health of poor women and women of color.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The brief also affirmed that Roe v. Wade recognized a &#8220;fundamental right&#8221; to abortion without which women &#8220;were stripped of the right of self-determination that is a given for men.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The Times reports that similar briefs were issued under Sotomayor to the Supreme Court cases Williams v. Zbaraz, Rust v. Sullivan, Ohio v. Akron Center, and Planned Parenthood v. Casey. <\/p>\n<p>While board members are not necessarily directly involved in such briefs, a May 28 New York Times article said the PRLDEF board &#8220;monitored all litigation undertaken by the fund&#8217;s lawyers,&#8221; and described Sotomayor as &#8220;an involved and ardent supporter of their various legal efforts.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;She just believed in the mission,&#8221; former board chairman Luis Alvarez said of Sotomayor.<\/p>\n<p>Several former members testified to the Times that &#8220;Ms. Sotomayor stood out, frequently meeting with the legal staff to review the status of cases&#8221; throughout her twelve years, serving at times as board member, vice president, and chairman of the litigation committee.<\/p>\n<p>Following a recent meeting with Sotomayor, pro-life Senator Jim DeMint expressed concern that the judge said she had &#8220;never thought about&#8221; the rights of the unborn child. DeMint&#8217;s account corresponds to the impression of pro-abortion senators, who say their meetings with Sotomayor satisfied them that she would &#8220;respect precedent&#8221; set by Roe v. Wade. <a href=\"http:\/\/catholicexchange.com\/2009\/06\/15\/119494\/ target=\"_blank\">[article]<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"blog\">Of course the other day Judge Sotomayor in response to a question said  She &#8220;Never Thought About&#8221; Rights of Unborn.  That is a rather scary statement if she is telling the truth.  Before you decide that a class of people should be legally killed you might want to think about the subject a bit.  Though when it comes to defending abortion it never comes down to intellectual arguments, but platitudes about choice or scenarios to invoke emotion.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A Washington Times editorial on Wednesday unveiled further evidence of Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor&#8217;s support for unlimited abortion rights. The paper revealed the contents of four more amicus curiae&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2225","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-pro-life"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.splendoroftruth.com\/curtjester\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2225","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.splendoroftruth.com\/curtjester\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.splendoroftruth.com\/curtjester\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.splendoroftruth.com\/curtjester\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.splendoroftruth.com\/curtjester\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2225"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.splendoroftruth.com\/curtjester\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2225\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.splendoroftruth.com\/curtjester\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2225"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.splendoroftruth.com\/curtjester\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2225"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.splendoroftruth.com\/curtjester\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2225"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}