November 21, 2007
Bishop's book of the month
Last week there was a humorous exchange at the Bishop's meeting over
an apparent typo in the draft of Faithful Citizenship where it said
"end
marriage" instead of "defend marriage."
Though sometimes you have wonder. Last week Leon Suprenant posted
about the use of a book by a dissident theologian being
recommended by the USCCB's marriage website at
www.foryourmarriage.com. A Daring Promise: A Spirituality of
Marriage By Richard R. Gaillardetz is promoted as
the book of the month. Gaillardetz is your typical dissident
theologian and Charles Curran admirer who apparently supports
homosexual
acts, women's ordination, has a quite flawed view of the
structure of the early Church and a narrow view on papal infallibility
and the magisterium (though an expansive one on the sensus fidelium).
The book that is recommended is reviewed on the bishop's site and says.
Several points may disturb some readers. draws upon Pope John Paul II's theology of the body yet offers gentle criticism. After admonishing couples to embrace church teaching on family planning through sound understanding and surrender to the rigorous demands of Christianity, he notes that a couple who still "cannot discover in (magisterial teaching) God's will" can follow their consciences. While he says most "domestic churches" are constituted by marriage and include children, he includes under that term other households.
Gee how could basically saying that if you don't want to follow the Church's teaching on the grave sin of contraception you just follow your badly formed conscience be something to "disturb some readers?" Well I guess if you just happen to be faithful to Church teaching and truth. Forget about those "rigorous demands of Christianity" and for example "picking up your cross daily." If only Gaillardetz had been there for Onan to explain to God how Onan's was just following his conscience.
One Amazon reviewer noted about this book "He comments on how he ran into a former classmate who was brilliant in college and now she was married with kids and he couldn't help but feel sorry that she "sold out" and stopped using her God given mind."
The comment section of the original post has some detailed critiques of the writings of Richard R. Gaillardetz.
In a new post by Leon Suprenant.
Regarding our recent post on the U.S.
Bishops’ new “For Your Marriage” website, we received the following
comment from marriage and family expert John F. Kippley regarding the
site’s recommendation of the work of Dr. Richard Gaillardetz:
“Thanks for directing me to the long analysis of the works of the
dissenting theologian, Dr. Richard Gaillardetz. It
appears that what he is doing is simply a repeat of what Fr. Curran and
others did in the Sixties . . . I thought the bishops were beyond that
stuff. . . . It is just crazy that the bishops would even mention works
by someone like Gaillardetz. . . .”
Another reader contacted the USCCB about the problematic site and
received this response:
“Dr. Gaillardetz is a well-known and respected Catholic theologian who
holds the chair in Catholic Studies at the University of Toledo. He has
been a guest presenter at a meeting of the Bishops’ Committee on
Marriage and Family. I don’t know if you’ve read “A Daring Promise,”
but it presents a realistic–and hopeful–vision of married life in a way
that is accessible to average Catholics. It is an important book in its
field. I think our reviewer did justice to the book by identifying its
strengths as well as noting what might be disturbing.”
Despite this disappointing response, we have good reason to believe
that the shortcomings of the site are being addressed at this time, and
we’ll keep our readers posted regarding further developments.
I hope he is right, but I am not exactly encouraged by the response. When you say dissenting from the magisterium "might be disturbing" instead of saying that it is flat out wrong you are not exactly making your case.
Posted by Jeff Miller at November 21, 2007 1:41 PM | TrackBackGRRRRRR!!! I realize that there is some merit in offering what is good in a book while pointing out some of its flaws.
But a) from the bishops conference? b) regarding marriage? ?!?!?? Why would you not find the best, most truth-clarifying author/book on the topic, and promote that, instead? Marriage is under attack, and our shepherds think that offering a book that mixes some 40% good with 60% harmful (and that, without a guide to what is harmful in it, if I understand correctly) is responsible conduct?
But a mirror would show me part of the problem: I need to do a lot more praying for our priests and bishops.
Here goes....Remember, O most gracious Virgin Mary,...
Posted by Margo email at November 21, 2007 2:19 PMWhat entitles someone to call oneself a theologian? Anyone know? This Gallardetz is way out there - believes "theologians" like himself should be part of the magisterium and doesn't believe what the magisterium promotes becomes valid until received and accepted by the people. Sincerely, what about the above question?
Posted by Bo Placebo email at November 21, 2007 3:33 PMHmph. It's not as if this theologian is the only Catholic who could write an authoritative book on marriage. You'd think they would have picked one who was not a dissident. But then, look at all the applause and honor Fr Greeley has received for his (gag) writing.
FYI, Galliardetz's books are promoted by the kudzu-like (in terms of expansion and worth) Why Catholic? parish catechetical program.
Posted by Rich Leonardi email at November 24, 2007 2:12 PM